facebook rss twitter

Review: Gigabyte GeForce RTX 2070 WindForce

by Tarinder Sandhu on 28 November 2018, 14:01

Tags: Gigabyte (TPE:2376), NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qadztl

Add to My Vault: x

Conclusion

...it overclocks rather well, too, matching the abilities of dearer pre-OC cards.

Gigabyte does plenty of things right with its cheapest GeForce RTX 2070 card. The £460 WindForce, sweetened by having Battlefield V as a free, redeemable game, adopts tried-and-trusted three-fan cooling on top of a large heatsink that makes good contact with the core. An extra baseplate takes care of associated cooling while a backplate provides board rigidity and extra help in wicking away heat.

Having a strict two-slot form factor is another plus point, and it overclocks rather well, too, matching the abilities of dearer pre-OC cards. There's even a semblance of RGB lighting, if that's your thing.

In fact, the only real negative, and it is a big one right now, is how the fans react when moving between 0rpm and full-on gaming, triggered at 60°C. This card exhibits the worst revving we've heard, though a simple BIOS fix ought to mitigate the issue.

The bottom line is that Gigabyte has created a solid RTX 2070 that's currently compromised by one flaw. Remove that, which should be easy enough, and it definitely deserves to go on the RTX 2070 shortlist.

 

The Good
 
The Bad
Solid performance at QHD
Battlefield V is free
Overclocks well
Two-slot form factor
 
Annoying fan revving


HEXUS.where2buy*

The Gigabyte GeForce RTX 2070 WindForce is available from Scan Computers.

HEXUS.right2reply

At HEXUS, we invite the companies whose products we test to comment on our articles. If any company representatives for the products reviewed choose to respond, we'll publish their commentary here verbatim.



HEXUS Forums :: 3 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
it is interesting there is not Battlefield V as a benchmark
Having seen the price I was worried I might regret my Vega64 purchase a few months back. But considering that it's a few FPS shy of the Vega64, essentially a last gen card, I'm pretty content considering I paid less for my card than this is asking (and my card is now £600?!!).

Also, it's very similar in performance to the GTX 1070 and the GTX1080 is faster. So basically this card represents no real increase in performance at the same price point after many years of development. In the old days we used to see decent increases in chooch factor every 6 months.

What this tells me is that the GPU market has not progressed one jot for normal gaming. It may do if you have a fortune but that's not normal gaming. Raytracing will probably be impossible on this card at anything approaching a decent resolution. Nvidia's new T&C prevent use of consumer cards (well, actually the drivers for them) for data centre use and so this is purely a gaming card.
Nvidia desperately needs some competition and AMD AT THE MOMENT is not providing any.
Their 590 is a good performer but that power draw is horrendous, nearly 2x power consumption for about 10% performance increase over the 1060 (game/benchmark dependent). According the