facebook rss twitter

Review: NVIDIA's ION platform aims to make Intel Atom netbooks better

by Tarinder Sandhu on 17 December 2008, 14:00

Tags: ION, NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaqio

Add to My Vault: x

A teeny-weeny box. Ding, ding: ION versus Yukon for 2009

A teeny-weeny desktop box



Coming back to ION, here's the reference platform built into a small chassis. Now, ION makes just as much sense, if not more, as a cheap desktop solution, especially if Intel ramps up production of dual-core Atom 330s quickly.

As a small, quiet, cheap multimedia box, ION and dual-core Atom would be a good fit. The Pico-ITX platform has provision for HDMI and 7.1-channel LPCM sound, of course, and a box that's comfortably smaller than three DVD cases stacked together sounds rather appealing.

NVIDIA's also keen to point out that GeForce 9400M, ostensibly a graphics chip, could also help with high-def. transcoding, and internal benchmarks show it to be 5x faster than the Atom CPU alone.


What we think

Intel's Atom has been a shot-in-the-arm for the mobile space because its introduction has allowed partners to bring extremely thin-and-light notebooks (ahem, netbooks) to market at low prices. These ultra-mobile laptops have caught the public's imagination but, now, we believe, users are clamouring for more performance. It seems that both AMD (with Yukon) and NVIDIA (with ION) are in agreement on this front.

NVIDIA's solution for a do-it-all netbook takes in GeForce 9400M and builds around it. We like the basic technology, but readers must be aware that the provision of extra power-  much-needed in our opinion - will come at a greater financial and spatial cost. Expect these kind of netbooks to cost £350+ and ship with larger screens, optical drives, bigger batteries and, of course, heavier weights.

Building on the success of Atom, we further believe that a significant market opportunity exits for a ~1.5kg netbook that has graphical/multimedia grunt to burn, and ION seems like a good fit, on paper at least.

More intriguingly, we see ION fit better into a 'nettop' environment, housed in a small box that ships with an SSD drive and passive cooling. Mini-HTPC springs to mind, too.

We can only pass judgment once retail examples become available. Hopefully that shouldn't be too long after the showcase at CES 2009, and we'll update this article with any new information that we glean in the intervening period between announcement and product.

Fundamentally, NVIDIA's ION removes the chipset limitations that have dogged the Atom platform and that can only be viewed as a good thing. What will be really, really interesting is to see how NVIDIA's ION shapes up against AMD's Yukon. Roll on 2009!


HEXUS Forums :: 9 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
hexus
when run via the power-frugal 945 chipset
I've never heard it being described as such before - most commentators lambast it for it's inefficiency.

LOL at the size of the nVidia chip compared to the Atom processor though :p
Power-frugal compared to any discrete games-playing solution though?

945-class mobile chipsets have better battery life than discrete GPUs, obviously. :)
By any measure 945G is NOT a frugal chipset! Its hite compared to Nvidia and AMD's integrated VGa solutions which are miles faster and more economical. Its not even frugal compared to say a Radeon 3450.

Just face it, 945G (and derivatives) are plain ****e!
So, you're not a fan of the 945 chipset then I take it? ;)
Methanoid
Just face it, 945G (and derivatives) are plain ****e!
They're also 3 and a half years old now.