facebook rss twitter

Review: Synology DS414j

by Parm Mann on 2 May 2014, 15:30

Tags: Synology

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qacdx5

Add to My Vault: x

Conclusion

Plenty of scope for capacity, a wealth of functionality, class-leading software and capable home-user performance delivered in an energy-efficient package.

Anyone looking to take their first steps into network-attached storage should take Synology's DS414j into serious consideration.

Launched to retail with a Ā£258 MSRP, this four-bay box sensibly balances price, performance and functionality to deliver an easy-to-use NAS that's primed for centralised storage in the home.

Presented in a simple and compact form factor, the DS414j covers only the essentials in terms of hardware design and includes a low-cost, low-power processor, two USB ports, and a single Gigabit Ethernet jack.

This is very much a no-frills box, yet with support for drive capacities of up to 5TB, and a user-friendly DSM 5.0 operating system that's arguably second to none, it excels at its primary objective: to manage, protect and share data.

Plenty of scope for capacity, a wealth of functionality, class-leading software and capable home-user performance delivered in an energy-efficient package. The DS414j comes highly recommended.

The Good

Dual-core processor
Energy efficient design
USB 3.0 connectivity
Class-leading DSM 5.0 software
Good choice of mobile apps
Supports up to 5TB drives

The Bad

Drive trays aren't tool free
Lacks front-facing I/O ports

HEXUS.awards


Synology DS414j

HEXUS.where2buy

The Synology DS414j four-bay NAS is available to purchase in a choice of capacities from Scan Computers*.

HEXUS.right2reply

At HEXUS, we invite the companies whose products we test to comment on our articles. If any company representatives for the products reviewed choose to respond, we'll publish their commentary here verbatim.



*UK-based HEXUS community members are eligible for free delivery and priority customer service through the SCAN.care@HEXUS forum.



HEXUS Forums :: 3 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
I don't really see how the benchmarks are comparable when you are using different HDD's in this particular NAS compared to the other three?

You may well find that shoving WD red drives into the others changes the balance of your charts!

Butuz
Did you fail to understand what was written on the Test Methodology page?

Here it is again:
“Readers should note that our usual hard drives - 1TB Samsung HD103SJs - have bitten the dust. 4TB WD Red hard drives (model WD40EFRX) have been introduced as a replacement and these drives will be used in all future NAS reviews. The following results should therefore not be used as a direct comparison, but rather as a guideline of the performance available from the Synology unit. Looking ahead, we will be revamping our NAS benchmark suite in the coming weeks, so please do get in touch and let us know if you'd like to see any tests in particular.”
A cheap Pentium G3220, H87 Micro-ATX mobo, RAM, a decent case (Aerocool Deadsilence) and a look at XPEnology will get you much the same with way more (Processing) grunt for somewhat less. Perhaps not ideal if you want a plug and play option admittedly, but perfect for the DIY fan (Like most Hexus readers I guess).

Also, page 2, 512GB of RAM not amount to much? When did RAM start growing on trees? EDIT: OK fixed now