facebook rss twitter

Review: Sima Hitch USB-101 transfer device

by Steve Kerrison on 12 August 2006, 11:37

Tags: Samsung (005935.KS)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qagg2

Add to My Vault: x

Thoughts, HEXUS.awards and HEXUS.right2reply

Final thoughts, HEXUS Awards, HEXUS Right2Reply

The idea behind Hitch is a good one, but how useful is it? For some, there's always going to be a PC nearby for file transfers, but we can think of few users who might need some on-the-go action. Amateur photographers might need a compact was of unloading the contents of their camera's memory card onto something a bit more capacious. College students might like to share the contents of their iPods with each other. We're not sure businessmen will be all that interested with quite a high chance of a laptop being in close proximity.

What it's important to realise, however, is that despite it being useful for some, some products exist with USB On-The-Go integrated into them. This allows a device to function as a host and another USB device as a slave. Transfers can then take place between the two without an intermediary device. Hitch, then, is only useful where this functionality doesn't exist on one of the devices in the user's possession. iPods don't have the feature, so iPod-to-iPod transfers aren't possible without the help of Hitch, as just one example.

So, when you think about it, the scope for Hitch's usage does seem more limited than at first. That said, it is going to be useful for some. In its USB-101 incarnation, Hitch's interface is simple and easy, so we reckon that's something Sima has got right from the start. We really like the 'here' and 'there' concept. However, we do have two reservations. The first is the transfer speed. Our tests show it's a rather slow and we'd greatly prefer high-speed support to enjoy USB 2.0 in all its glory wherever possible. Secondly, there's the trouble we had with connecting some of our devices.

If any software compatibility issues with devices exist, these can probably quite easily be fixed with a software update to Hitch. However, we're a bit worried about it being unable to power our 2.5" hard drive when it runs just fine off a PC's USB port.

Set to retail for around Ā£100, Hitch comes with a 12-month warranty. The warranty is OK, but we believe it to be a little on the expensive side. If it had high speed support, then we'd probably say it was worth it. Nevertheless, its PTP support broadens the number of digital cameras its supports, which gives it an edge over many other similar devices on the market.

It's easy to use and it's useful for some, but we'd rather wait for a faster version (with a bit more juice from battery too) to surface.

HEXUS Awards

HEXUS.labs :: Media

HEXUS Right2Reply

At HEXUS.net, we invite the companies whose products we test to comment on our articles. If any of Htch's representatives choose to do so, we'll publish their commentary here verbatim.

We've received correspondence from Sima indicating that our review sample's lack of charging and incorrect adapter may have contributed to sub-standard performance. Sima is sending us the correct adapter and we will re-test the unit and update the performance numbers should they change.


HEXUS Forums :: 2 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Dont belkin have a box of tricks like this, thats out at the moment?

Imp
Having read that review, and considering that alternatives exist, I don’t think it should get any awards.

The Hitch is competing against simple USB copy devices and hard drive enclosures that can copy from other devices. (eg the Thecus YES nano 2.5” enclosure) Both are relatively cheap and foolproof to use, but copy everything and only recognise FAT file systems. Alternatively people can use a PC, laptop or USB equipped PDA, but these are more expensive, and less portable.

The Hitch should be able to fit between the two, offering more versatility to choose which files to copy and work with many file systems, but without the bulk and cost associated with a laptop. However from reading the review, I think it fails in most areas.

  1. You where unable to get it to connect to any USB hard drives. Considering that this would be a major use for this device, having it not work is a major limitation. You thought that the 2.5” drive might be drawing to much current, but that was not confirmed. You could have measured the current draw using the windows device manager, or confirmed that it was the problem by connecting via a powered hub. As for the powered icybox enclosure, there is no excuse. That should work; if it does not there is a problem.
  2. The manufacturer is deceptively advertising the device as USB 2 when it does not transfer at USB2 speeds. I know what the standards say, but to most consumers, USB2 means fast. The reviewer should not be defending this deception. I would expect a device like this to be limited by the speeds of the devices connected to it, not the pedestrian slow speeds of 12 megabit/s USB.
  3. Considering that this device runs Linux, I would expect it to be much more versatile in the protocols it speaks. Linux contains file system drivers that can read almost anything; including Mac HPFS and windows NTFS so why is this device limited to FAT file systems. (Even read)?
From reading the review I would not buy this device for the price. If it where £20 I might be willing to live with its limitations, and perhaps do some Linux hacking to fix them, but not for £100. It needs to go back to the drawing board.