facebook rss twitter

Review: WD Black SN750 NVMe SSD (1TB)

by Tarinder Sandhu on 31 January 2019, 14:01

Tags: WD (NYSE:WDC)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qad343

Add to My Vault: x

Conclusion

...the WD Black SN750 rightfully takes its place at the premium PCIe x4 NVMe table, at least for now.

WD is now building compelling high-performance client SSDs by moving all aspects of production and design in-house. The reviewed SN750 is a good case in point, using ostensibly the same hardware as last year's IoT-focussed SN720 but improving general performance via firmware updates.

The headline speed numbers stack up well against the competition, there's security in knowing that WD, being a very large storage specialist, is likely to offer excellent support, and so the WD Black SN750 rightfully takes its place at the premium PCIe x4 NVMe table, at least for now.

That said, it's still a TLC-based NAND drive whose endurance, while decent in isolation, is nowhere near as robust as the Corsair MP510, and the fact that performance is so similar to the 2018 model means that drives featuring other controller vendors, such as the very speedy Silicon Motion (SM2262EN), may leapfrog the WD's performance in the near future.

Bottom line: a solid, no-nonsense premium client SSD from an established brand representing a safe go-to solution for your next PC upgrade.

The Good
 
The Bad

Solid performance
Five-year warranty
Big-name support

 
Not big leap over 2018 drive
Endurance not amazing



WD Black SN750 NVMe SSD 1TB

HEXUS.where2buy*

The WD Black SN750 1TB NVMe SSD is available from Scan Computers*

HEXUS.right2reply

At HEXUS, we invite the companies whose products we test to comment on our articles. If any company representatives for the products reviewed choose to respond, we'll publish their commentary here verbatim.



*UK-based HEXUS community members are eligible for free delivery and priority customer service through the SCAN.care@HEXUS forum.



HEXUS Forums :: 4 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Posting these results isn't really relevant to most people, would be so much better if it was compared to say the best selling drives that people actually use.
And even then maybe a time % so say a real test that real users use in the real world? maybe compare it with sata ssd's.

All i know from this review is yes its faster and more expensive but how much faster ? who knows
Nah, why benchmark stuff people actually use? We'd be informed then…They need more time to get back to 4k testing (that again, nobody uses, according to 125mil steam users <1.4% use 4k). You know, the important stuff…LOL. Review sites that test in ways that resemble what we actually do or play on our PC's are useless…Why would you want informed readers?…I digress…
nobodyspecial
We'd be informed then…They need more time to get back to 4k testing (that again, nobody uses, according to 125mil steam users <1.4% use 4k). You know, the important stuff…LOL. Review sites that test in ways that resemble what we actually do or play on our PC's are useless…Why would you want informed readers?…I digress…

… and yet from the weekly question thread so far (quick tally up to post #76) I make it 10 people on 4K vs 18 people on 1080p. The most popular by far is 1440p with 27 users.

So of the people who are likely to reply to a forum thread, ie the ones you are constantly arguing with, 1080p is the lowest they will tolerate and most of us have moved beyond it.
So yeah, review with what we game at which is 1440, or what we hope to game at which is 1440 or 4K. Include 1080 as a baseline.

But then we also want to read reviews of stuff that is desirable and often out of our reach, I've read reviews of Ferraris but not yet owned one.
Something else that also grinds my gears…why compare 1Tb-class drives all round…apart from the Samsung?? The 1Tb version of that drive is MUCH faster!!

Gah…

Also, yes - they should include a 1Tb WD Black mechanical HD as well as a 1Tb SATA SSD for ease of relevance.