facebook rss twitter

Review: NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GTX 512

by Ryszard Sommefeldt on 14 November 2005, 14:01

Tags: NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qad2a

Add to My Vault: x

Thoughts

NVIDIA's efforts with the new G70 earn them the overall performance crown back, and by quite some margin. At 550MHz across the board and with 512MiB of memory running at 1.7GHz effective, it would have been embarassing had that not been the case. That didn't happen, though, and the reference-clocked GTX 512 has no trouble dispatching GeForce 7800 GTX and Radeon X1800 XT to the sidelines.

Quite simply a performance monster, and one that'll take ATI a big effort to beat. The GeForce 7800 GTX 512 impresses hugely, from quiet and efficient cooler, to manageable increase in power draw over the original GTX, with monsterous performance and day-zero availability in-between.

While certain facets of ATI's new Radeon hardware make it more appealing on paper, it's taking time for those technological advantages to come to fruition as part of games, making the latest GeForce hardware even more appealing in the interim. The current real-world performance of both GTX and GTX 512 cement that statement.

I'd have liked to have seen the second DVI port be dual-link, too, but that's about all I'd change on the physical side of things. Dual-slot makes no difference in the face of the competition, especially when the cooler does so well.

There's plenty that I haven't shown explicitly in graphs, which are also real upsides to the GTX 512 hardware, versus the original GTX that now sits below it. Transparency antialiasing is usable more of the time, and 8xS becomes a mode worth trying out more often than not (even at high resolution). Disabling the default filtering optimisations across the board almost becomes an academic thing to do, too, given the surplus of texture sampling rate available on the 550MHz GPU. We simply didn't have the time to check out 8xS performance in more detail, sadly.

Future testing to examine same-clock performance versus the 256MiB GTX will have to wait, too. Hopefully the performance investigation at high resolutions is enough to satisfy for the time being. In short, the GeForce 7800 GTX 512 has instantly become the fastest single consumer graphics board money can buy. Only NVIDIA's own 7800-based SLI solutions can go faster at the time of writing. The performance is carried well, too, with a great cooler and good usable features.

At a launch price of £516.99 including VAT right now, from Scan, you can have one in your hands today if you're feeling flush. It's a fair chunk more expensive than the current ~£410 required to secure a Radeon X1800 XT, but then the performance difference will often make the higher price seem good value.

Look out for SLI testing with another GTX 512 at HEXUS, versus 7800 GTX SLI, in the very near future. The following combination doesn't quite work yet, heh.

Heh



HEXUS Awards

Extreme HEXUS Labs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 512MB

Extreme Speed
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 512MB

Gaming Speed
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 512MB



HEXUS Right2Reply

HEXUS invites the manufacturers and vendors that supply HEXUS with products for evaluation to comment on the reviews and previews that we publish. HEXUS have invited NVIDIA and their representatives to comment on this article. If they choose to respond, we'll publish their response verbatim.


HEXUS Forums :: 25 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
WOoohoo its awesome! Definetly worth the wait. Price is even more steep than i expected though! Im sure it will drop a little though in a few weeks!

ATI is really in the dogs now!

Neo
Owned… Totally owned… Ahh! Whats that shiny hat behind ur back ATI? Give it back now…. You could just wait till R580 comes out..

But the £500 price tag is way way too much..
Well, duh! No wonder the SLIFire setup didn't work –you didn't hook the cards together, ninny! This is the *real* purpose of the ATI interconnect model. . . ;)
sawyen
Owned… Totally owned… Ahh! Whats that shiny hat behind ur back ATI? Give it back now…. You could just wait till R580 comes out..

But the £500 price tag is way way too much..

YUP, pleased with the price I paid for my x1800xt now. I still think after a few drivers these ATI cards will be up there.
I have to call bunk on your Farcry benchmarks. I have no clue what went wrong there, but this site is the ONLY one showing Farcry giving X1800XT that kind of lead. You attribute it to a bug in the drivers, yet none of the other sites running this bench show this kind of difference. As much as I like this site, I have to say I think something was done wrong somewhere with your Farcry testing that caused even worse performance loss then is normally attributed to that bug as it's NOT consistant with the majority findings.

http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=182&type=expert&pid=5

http://www.guru3d.com/article/Videocards/285/17/

http://www.hothardware.com/hothardware.com_non_ssl/viewarticle.aspx (this one won't let me link straight to the page, lameness.but interestingly enough tests with both Nforce 4 SLI board AND Crossfire motherboard handy)

The Radeon X18000 XT was able to outrun the GeForce 7800 GTX 512MB by a couple of frames per second at 1600x1200 when AA and aniso were used, but at the lower resolution the GeForce came out ahead by a similar margin.

If we factor in the performance of the SLI configurations though, NVIDIA's platform is untouchable. A pair of 512Mb GeForce 7800 GTX cards is over 15% faster than a pair of 256MB cards, and remains CPU bound even when FarCry's resolution is ratcheted way up and anti-aliasing and anisotropic filtering are used.

Is simply a couple of several EVERY bit as trustworthy sites showing something VERY different then what you got. I don't question your ethics AT ALL, instead I question your techniques used as they're inconsistant with too many others results. The CPU limitation of this game should NOT allow so high a margin as you saw. Granted, I too question SOMEWHAT where they show a single 7800 GTX 512 beating a X1800XT at all, but the X1800XT's lead should ONLY be marginal at best.

Edit: Even further looking into this, CPU scaling should make a much larger difference then the cards in question then you chart showed. These next results taken from the Guru3D article show CPU scaling is not done with this game even with the mighty FX-57 and beyond.

http://www.guru3d.com/article/Videocards/285/24/