facebook rss twitter

Review: PowerColor X800 GT Xtreme 256MB and X800 GT EVO Tide Water 256MB

by Tarinder Sandhu on 14 October 2005, 09:44

Tags: PowerColor (6150.TWO)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qadrx

Add to My Vault: x

Final thoughts

Final thoughts

PowerColor's added to its range of Radeon X800 GT-based graphics cards by releasing a couple of special editions that bring something new to the table. Taking the Xtreme version first, it's differentiated from the standard edition by the use of faster Samsung GDDR3 memory that's run at 1050MHz (up from the default 980MHz) and, in tandem, with an increased core speed of 500MHzm which, again, is above the default's 475MHz. The price you pay for faster clocks through the use of better components is a price rise of around £20 above the £105 X800 GT 256MB card.

The problem that PowerColor faces with its £125 X800 GT Xtreme 256MB package is one brought about by ATI having a number of SKUs at midrange price-points. £120 or so is now home to the Radeon X800 GTO 256MB model, which runs with 50% greater rendering pipelines, albeit with slower core and memory clocks. As our graphs indicated, the GTO is comfortably faster than PowerColor's souped-up dual-DVI 'GT, so much so that even in overclocked mode the X800 Xtreme GT was still slower. In view of this and the keen pricing of a bunch of Radeon X800 GTO 256MB cards, it becomes difficult to recommend it at all. Put simply, if you have £120 and want a PCI-Express card, we'd recommend looking at ATI's X800 GTO first.

Moving on to the other PowerColor card that ships with an identical PCB and, consequently, identical core and memory speeds, the X800 GT EVO Tide Water is more of a design showcase than anything else. £199 for a package that performs at sub-X800 GTO levels tells you only half the story. The other half rests with just how PowerColor has architected the card. It's the first that we've seen which ships with a self-contained watercooling kit as standard.

In cahoots with Thermaltake and its Tide Water cooling system, PowerColor's managed to release an all-in-one bundle that performs reasonably well. However, we would have liked to have seen some form of thermal monitoring on the card and, really, cooling for memory chips, too. Tide Water cooling, by its very nature, would make better sense on high-end GPUs, we feel, and it will be available to buy separately in the near future.

So, in summary, we've looked at a couple of PowerColor X800 GT cards and have come away with the feeling that whilst both offer something new in the marketplace, the respective asking prices takes away much of their shine. Novel, exciting products? Yes. Value-for-money? Not quite.

- PowerColor X800 GT Xtreme 256MB

- PowerColor X800 GT EVO Tide Water 256MB



HEXUS Forums :: 3 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Steve
Designed by Thermaltake, dubbed Tide Water, it's the first liquid-cooling system we've seen thus far that's architected solely for graphics card cooling.
You've completely overlooked the Gainward Cool FX range of cards which has been around for years, ever since the 5900 ultra model. There is currently a 6800 ultra version I believe.
Correct me if I'm wrong, lost eden, but Cool FX, while indeed a watercooling solution, requires that you put the rest of the kit together, whereas the Tide Water system is a complete cooling system, but designed solely for the graphics card.
Well that depends entirely upon your use of the word ‘architected’. If you mean that the tide is the first system built from scratch for a graphics card then yes it is the first (whereas the cool fx uses ‘standard’ PC water cooling components). If you mean that it is the first graphics card to come with a commercial water cooler stock then no, its not the first.

However I do remember reading in a magazine of a board that came with the water cooling components (pump, resovoir, radiator, etc.) all contained within a single 5.25" enclosure, requiring no more assembly than the tide, though I don't know whether that was ever released to the public or whether it was just a trade/review sample. It was geforce FX era I believe.