facebook rss twitter

Review: A peek at NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 in SLI - just how fast is it?

by Tarinder Sandhu on 26 March 2010, 23:00

Tags: GeForce GTX 480, NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaws4

Add to My Vault: x

Brief summary of GTX 480 in SLI

NVIDIA's GeForce GTX 480 is the world's fastest single-GPU graphics card. Achieving this aim by using the GF100 underpinnings allied to a brute force approach, the card runs hot and needs a quality cooler to keep temperatures in check.

We don't believe that NVIDIA will come to market with a dual-GPU GTX 480 card anytime soon, so the next best method for increasing performance is to strap another one into the chassis and to tie them up with an SLI connector.

Evaluated at a 2,560x1,600 resolution with high-quality settings, two GTX 480 GPUs produce decent scaling - over 80 per cent in most cases - and frame-rates hit stratospheric levels.

The real benefit of multi-GPU GeForce GTX 4x0 cards will be felt when NVIDIA releases its 3D Vision Surround driver - ForceWare 256 - next month. Driving three screens at a 5,760x1,080 resolution with full 3D support will take considerable horsepower - a task at which two, or even three, GTX 480s should be rather good at.

NVIDIA, though, isn't going to have it easy in the ultra-high-end graphics space, as AMD is busy putting the finishing touches to its Eyefinity6 multi-monitor setup and has included 3D stereoscopic support in its latest drivers.

Impressed by the SLI results? Reckon NVIDIA has some way to go? We'd love to hear your thoughts in the HEXUS.community.



HEXUS Forums :: 39 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
HEXUS
What do you get when you combine two GeForce GTX 480s and unleash them on our benchmarks?

the police raiding you for an illegal cannabis grow due to the leccy bill doubling!
In the games that matter, paying £450 for a GTX480 nets you almost identical performance to that of a £310 HD5870. On top of that, a £900 pair of the cards on an 850W PSU can barely beat a £550 HD5970 on a 550W PSU. I am seriously unimpressed by the GTX400 architecture. If it were priced appropriately (i.e. £350 or so for the 480) and used a lot less power, it'd be worthwhile.
As it stands, my pair of HD4870X2s that cost me less than £600 in 2008, can take on a brand new pair of GTX480s costing £900, pretty much keep pace, and better yet, use less power!
Back to the drawing board methinks.
sammorris
In the games that matter, paying £450 for a GTX480 nets you almost identical performance to that of a £310 HD5870. On top of that, a £900 pair of the cards on an 850W PSU can barely beat a £550 HD5970 on a 550W PSU. I am seriously unimpressed by the GTX400 architecture. If it were priced appropriately (i.e. £350 or so for the 480) and used a lot less power, it'd be worthwhile.
As it stands, my pair of HD4870X2s that cost me less than £600 in 2008, can take on a brand new pair of GTX480s costing £900, pretty much keep pace, and better yet, use less power!
Back to the drawing board methinks.

WRONG…

GTX470 gives you identical performance to that of a HD5870. The GTX470 is CHEAPER then the HD5870. Two GTX470 in SLI would still beat the HD5970, and that is the config most of us will choose.
Lol'ed resident nvidiot has showed up.
They haven't even benchmarked the GTX470 yet…

Edit: now the GTX470 is benched, whadda'ya'know, it's the same as an HD5850.
The Wrong in capital letters made me laugh, it really did.
From HardOCP:
GeForce GTX 470

Starting from the bottom up, we would say the least relevant video card is the GeForce GTX 470. In all our gameplay testing today, not once did the GeForce GTX 470 provide a superior gameplay experience compared to the Radeon HD 5850, even in Metro 2033. In fact, performance was very close between both video cards, and in some cases the Radeon HD 5850 proved to provide faster framerates. Looking strictly at performance, these video cards are equal.