facebook rss twitter

Review: Inno3D GeForce GT 220: something new from NVIDIA?

by Parm Mann on 9 November 2009, 06:00 2.65

Tags: GeForce GT 220 (Inno3D), NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA), Inno3D

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaurl

Add to My Vault: x

Final thoughts, rating and HEXUS.right2reply

Whilst enthusiasts await the arrival of NVIDIA's GeForce 300-series architecture, the company's first 40nm retail parts act as a low-end precursor for what's to come.

However, albeit adequate for low-res, low-quality gaming, readers will be aware that NVIDIA's GeForce 210 and GeForce GT 220 are only on par with year-old, cheaper cards from AMD. Indeed, the Radeon HD 4670 takes the GT 220 to task in every game.

Where the cards do show some purpose is in the media or HTPC environment, where a decent choice of outputs, cool operation, low power consumption and the ongoing promise of CUDA acceleration combine to create a competitive all-round package that, albeit without bitstream support. It's a package that will appeal to OEMs - and pre-built systems are likely to be the area in which NVIDIA continues to sell the majority of these GPUs.

Looking specifically at the Inno3D GeForce GT 220, it's a stock-clocked card that currently remains one of the few GeForce GT 220 solutions priced at around £50. Despite the relatively cheap asking price, however, the card is notably noisy both when idle and under load, negating the requirements of most HTPC users. Shopping around, readers will find factory-overclocked cards with PWM-controlled coolers for an additional few pounds, and those who demand a near-silent computing experience may want to seek out passively-cooled alternatives.

For readers wanting a little more graphical grunt whilst keeping to a budget, it's worth noting that NVIDIA will be launching a 200-series mid-range card soon. The GeForce GT 240 aims to fill the gap between the reviewed card and the long-in-the-tooth GeForce 9600 GT. 

HEXUS Rating

We consider any product score above '5/10' as a safe buy. The higher the score, the higher the recommendation from HEXUS to buy. Simple, straightforward buying advice.

The rating is given in relation to the category the component competes in, therefore Inno3D's GeForce GT 220 is evaluated with respect to our 'budget' criteria.

53%
Inno3D GeForce GT 220

HEXUS Where2Buy

The Inno3D GeForce GT 220 graphics card can be ordered now from the following retailers:


As always, UK-based HEXUS.community discussion forum members will benefit from the SCAN2HEXUS Free Shipping initiative, which will save you a further few pounds plus also top-notch, priority customer service and technical support backed up by the SCANcare@HEXUS forum.

TBC
 
at a cost of £49.73 (DDR2 version)

HEXUS Right2Reply

At HEXUS, we invite the companies whose products we test to comment on our articles. If any company representatives for the products reviewed choose to respond, we'll publish their commentary here verbatim.



HEXUS Forums :: 14 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
sort out a speed adjustable fan and keep it sub £50 and it's a goer :)

With 3 different outputs, plenty of frame buffer and IF it were near silent, it'll cater for loads of desk top PC's, for photo's and video work.

The tiny 210 interested me too, to replaceolder onbaord video on mobo's for under the telly in the living room, and playing The Sims on.
Useless for a HTPC, it doesn't support bitstreaming of HD audio over HDMI, like the ATI 5XXX series does.
GDDR2. Blew up any interest I had.
But are the cards necessary? And forgive us for even suggesting such a thing, but with specifications so closely matched, why not just rebrand the GeForce 9400 GT and GeForce 9500 GT as GeForce 200-series products?

funny you should say that
As mentioned by OilSheik, the Inno3D card you've linked to at ebuyer is the DDR2 version with memory running at an effective 800MHz, *not* the DDR3 version. The massively reduced memory bandwidth is bound to significantly reduce performance. The cheapest DDR3 GT220 I can find from the “usual” (in these forums, anyway ;) ) preferred etailers is this Gigabyte from Scan, which is also pre-overclocked and has a big chunky non-reference cooler. A quick google suggests that they can be picked up from around £50 inc vat, but at that price they should be compared to a HD4670, which has a significant performance advantage over the 4650… while this is an interesting review of the new NVidia card (a review I'd been hoping for for a while, tbh, as I'm quite interested in the GT220) it's simply not comparing the right products…

EDIT: A further prod of Google has shown that a Palit 512MB DDR3 version can be had from a variety of etailers starting at ~ £46, which makes it more comparable to the 4650 (and reducing the frame buffer shouldn't affect gaming performance @ those resolutions). That still doesn't change the fact that the link in the article is misleading though…