facebook rss twitter

Microsoft Surface Book Nvidia GeForce GPU details emerge

by Mark Tyson on 19 October 2015, 10:04

Tags: Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT), Surface

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qacvjz

Add to My Vault: x

Over the weekend it seems like various Redditors have been able to tinker with Surface Book 2-in-1 machines at the Microsoft Store. With varying success they have been trying to determine the exact Nvidia GPU that Microsoft has chosen to equip in its top of the range Surface Book model. Now we have some screenshots from the various Redditors as 'proof' of the GPU specs. (1, 2)

Microsoft launched the Surface Pro 4 tablet hybrid and surprised us with the new Surface Book 2-in-1 at an event on 6th October. We heard that the Surface Book would pack similar processors to those in the Surface Pro 4, namely Intel Skylake Core i5 and i7 chips. However the top of the range Surface Book promised a discrete Nvidia GeForce GPU.

Unfortunately Microsoft didn't reveal any details about the dGPU it had chosen to equip in its "ultimate laptop," which it claims is the "fastest 13-inch laptop ever made anywhere on any planet". So over the last fortnight we've been waiting patiently for official word.

People are already laying down their cash for the Microsoft Surface Book, with reports that it is sold out at this stage, or at least you will have to face weeks of delays in shipment. Yet we don't have any proper specs for the Nvidia GPU in the top model. As mentioned in the intro, some Reddit members have managed to run TechPowerUp's GPUz on the Surface Book as well as a few other utilities to try and determine the GPU equipped.

One user who couldn't run GPUz, due to not having admin rights, checked out the Nvidia Control Panel. This is what 'BullOak' discovered:

  • Operating System: Windows 10 Pro, 64-bit
  • DirectX version: 12.0
  • GPU processor: GeForce GPU
  • Driver version: 354.15
  • Direct3D API version: 12
  • Direct3D feature level: 11_0
  • CUDA Cores: 384
  • Core clock: 954 MHz
  • Memory data rate: 5010 MHz
  • Memory interface: 64-bit
  • Memory bandwidth: 40.08 GB/s
  • Total available graphics memory: 5081 MB
  • Dedicated video memory: 1024 MB GDDR5
  • System video memory: 0 MB
  • Shared system memory: 4057 MB
  • Video BIOS version: 82.08.4D.00.01
  • IRQ: Not used
  • Bus: PCI Express x4 Gen3
  • Device Id: 10DE 134B 00081414
  • Part Number: 2702 0001

Other redditors were more successful in getting to install programs and two of them managed to run GPUz (as linked in the intro paragraph). The results are embedded below. As you can see, Microsoft's custom Nvidia dGPU is approximately similar to the Nvidia GeForce 940M.

click to zoom in

2x MacBook Pro speed

In a related piece of news, Microsoft News garnered a quote from Microsoft elaborating on the launch event claim that the Surface Book is "2x more powerful than a MacBook Pro". The news site asked for clarification; which MacBook Pro had been compared, for example? Microsoft gave the following statement in reply:

"Our validated performance claims are for the Microsoft Surface Book with an Intel Core i7 with 16GB RAM and custom discrete NVIDIA GeForce GPU against the MacBook Pro 13-inch with Retina display with an Intel Core i7 with 16GB RAM. We used third-party benchmarks to test the best available Surface Book against the best available 13-inch MacBook Pro."

Microsoft Surface Book shipments to pre-order customers and any retail availability will begin on 26th October.

HEXUS Forums :: 18 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Always makes me smile when i read reports that Microsoft have yet again sold out, you would think seeing as how every previous version of the Surface have also sold out that they would've worked out stock levels by now.

They maybe selling out but statistics show they still have a pitiful share of the market, if Microsoft wants to change that they've got a lot of work to do on the supply side of things.
“We used third-party benchmarks to test the best available Surface Book against the best available 13-inch MacBook Pro, neither of which is worth the over inflated price tag”

Fixed it ;)
Aw that 940M is disappointing. I had hoped for a 950M, 960, or 965.
940m is still pretty adequate for laptop style gaming and running about with things like photoshop and video compiling. Commonly Laptops labelled “gaming” have a x20m and x40m being the better version. It's only when you get to the USS Enterprise NCC-1701-E area of gaming/performance laptops which are at least a k and a half when you get to the x80m series. Coupled with this being an all in one, if they did do that, you'd be looking in the 3k+ price range and plus the cooling for those laptops makes them huge and battery life not worth even mentioning. The choice of x40m I think is good choice between performance/cooling/power/draw/size :)
It's not even a 940M… it's slower and has less bandwidth, you could maybe call it a 935M, well considering there isn't really any upgrade between the 940 and the 840 you could call it an 835 lol.

When you think about what that is pretty pointless especially with the hi res screen, not to mention the iris/iris pro gpu's in the latest skylake cpu's probably isn't far off performance wise. They could have at least stretched to a 2gb 950M considering the price etc.