facebook rss twitter

ASUS and Gigabyte GeForce GTX 900 series cards seen listed

by Mark Tyson on 8 September 2014, 10:30

Tags: NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA), ASUSTeK (TPE:2357), Gigabyte (TPE:2376)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaciuj

Add to My Vault: x

We have previously heard whispers that Nvidia will skip the GeForce GTX 800 series of desktop cards and go straight to the GeForce GTX 900 series. The first time you officially see and hear about these new graphics cards will probably be at the climax of the Game24 global 24hr PC gaming celebration, which kicks off on 18th September.

In the last few days the naming rumours appear to have started firming up somewhat as appropriately named and specified Nvidia Graphics cards have appeared in retailer/distributor listings. Synnex, a major IT supply chain corporation, has spilled listings of both ASUS and Gigabyte GeForce GTX 900 series cards. Both these major AiB makers have prepared at least two new SKUs for launch; a GTX 970 based model and a GTX 980 based model.

ASUS appears to have prepped a reference GTX 980 design and a STRIX GTX 970 graphics card. VideoCardz unearthed the Synnex listings of both these SKUs. As regular HEXUS readers will know the ASUS Strix range employs a cooler which doesn't even spin up its fans until a certain temperature level is reached helping you enjoy a quieter system in your quieter computing moments.

Gigabyte's Synnex listing reveals more specs, and we can see the key configuration of these SKUs in the listings as follows:

  • Gigabyte GTX 970 G1 Gaming (GV_N970GI_GAMING_4GD)
    NVIDIA GTX970 128*32 DDR5 256 BIT
  • Gigabyte GTX 980 (GV_N980D5_4GD_B)
    NVIDIA GTX980 256BIT/4096MB/PCI-E 3.0/128*32 DDR5 256 BIT

VideoCardz explains that according to its information the GTX 970 cards have been ready for much longer than the GTX 980 ones. Thus AiBs have had time to work their magic on them, producing the signature versions you would expect. Meanwhile both ASUS and Gigabyte have only readied reference design GTX 980 cards.

In related supply chain revelations Guru 3D has noted that the Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 is listed on a Europe based pricewatch engine. The following spec is revealed (but the 'GM104' reference is a slip and should be GM204):

  • Chip: GM104 "Maxwell"
  • Memory: 4 GB GDDR5, 256bit
  • Shader units / TMU / ROP: 2560/160/64
  • Fab: 28nm
  • Shader model 5.0
  • Interface: PCIe 3.0 x16
  • Slot: dual-slot
  • Power: 2x 6-pins PCIe

Back at VideoCardz, the team has made a 3DMark performance chart showing comparative scores of the Nvidia GeForce 900 and 900M series with currently available graphics cards from AMD and Nvidia. The source of the cards and scores is unknown so while the figures are fun and interesting you should, of course, take this data with a pinch of salt.



HEXUS Forums :: 15 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Nvidia going to pull another GTX680 stunt, cheap cards released overpriced, then bring the big guns out five months later, won't sucker me in this time.
raven1001
Nvidia going to pull another GTX680 stunt, cheap cards released overpriced, then bring the big guns out five months later, won't sucker me in this time.

My thoughts exactly. Looks like single card 4K gaming is another generation away… still. Had high hopes for the Maxwell GPUs.
It does seem that these are likley more of a ‘reduced power consumption’ version of the high end 7xx series than anything else based on this 3d mark table. Cuda performance could be slightly higher though.

I do like the increased ram to 4GB though, could mean we get an 8GB titan….or I might be able to get away with a cheaper 980 with 4GB… I'm more interested in gpu rendering so the more ram the better :)
I never understand the reasoning behind naming schemes. Wouldn't it appear better to release a new generation under a new noclamature? As it sits now then, the Maxwell revision will be the new naming scheme; although I guess that's their reasoning is most people will see a new name and immediately think “entirely new product”.
robb213
I never understand the reasoning behind naming schemes. Wouldn't it appear better to release a new generation under a new noclamature? As it sits now then, the Maxwell revision will be the new naming scheme; although I guess that's their reasoning is most people will see a new name and immediately think “entirely new product”.
But this is an entirely new product. :/