facebook rss twitter

Intel Core i9-10900K vs AMD Ryzen 9 3950X with GeForce RTX 3090

by Tarinder Sandhu on 7 October 2020, 14:01

Tags: Intel (NASDAQ:INTC), AMD (NYSE:AMD), ASUSTeK (TPE:2357)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaeop6

Add to My Vault: x

Conclusion

The gap naturally closes as the subsystem becomes less of an influence...

If you are fortunate enough to be genuinely considering the GeForce RTX 3090 then chances are you'll have appropriate budget for the supporting cast. Those contemplating a new build will likely pair the monster GPU with the best that Intel and AMD has to offer on their mainstream platforms. Right now, those two chips are the 10C20T Core i9-10900K (£550) and 16C32T Ryzen 9 3950X (£680).

Benchmarking eight titles at three resolutions on systems housing these processors and other high-end kit highlights a clear truth. Intel's premier mainstream chip remains the fastest solution if the primary purpose is extracting the highest fps at FHD. To this end, it is, on average, 8.1 percent faster than AMD. Average doesn't tell you a whole heap because the gap is entirely dependent upon games engine. Far Cry New Dawn, for example, is 25 percent faster while Borderlands 3 is merely 3.8 percent. If it needs one, AMD's defence is that 3950X still enables the RTX 3090 to average over 100fps in every title.

The gap naturally closes as the subsystem becomes less of an influence. Intel remains in the ascendant at QHD, albeit to a degree that is not readily perceivable during gameplay. At 4K, however, there is next to no difference between the pair, and it's AMD that's faster more often than not.

Those needing every last fps ought to consider, for now, Intel Core i9 first and foremost. Its high-frequency operation represents an identifiable benefit at FHD, especially for fast-paced games allied to high-framerate monitors featuring G-Sync technology. AMD makes a strong case at QHD and UHD for gamers more used to running at between 60-120fps, plus its forward-looking motherboard support and sheer core-and-thread muscle in creator apps is impossible to ignore.

Making matters more nebulous for those itching on the buy-it-now buttons is the emergence of AMD's Zen 3-based processors, likely out very soon, and purportedly offering improved single-thread performance and higher frequencies, if reports are to be believed. Decisions, decisions.

Wanting to build the ultimate gaming rig? GeForce RTX 3090 is a good place to start, but we'd actually hold fire until AMD has fully revealed its Zen 3 and Big Navi hand.



HEXUS Forums :: 16 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Not sure of the value of this, given what's coming in a few days.
Hexus, on the control page you state:

Intel enjoys a small lead at FHD and QHD, but it's not large enough to be perceptible during gameplay.

but your graph actually has AMD ahead at QHD unless the labels on the graph bars are wrong?
kalniel
Not sure of the value of this, given what's coming in a few days.

It's the current state of play. Whichever AMD CPU comes out in a couple of weeks will be added to this to show how Ryzen has progressed. Consider this a baseline article.
If your spending £5-600 on a CPU and £1400 on a GPU you are not gaming at 1080p or 1440p - so surely a pretty pointless exercise other than to show intel in better light??
nwmark
If your spending £5-600 on a CPU and £1400 on a GPU you are not gaming at 1080p or 1440p - so surely a pretty pointless exercise other than to show intel in better light??

We thought that, but there games where fps is king, typically played at the lower resolutions. It also taps into the recent influx of high-framerate FreeSync/G-Sync monitors.

I'm personally more intrigued to see where upcoming Zen 3 sits in all this; a final nail in the 14nm+++++++++++++++++++++ coffin, perhaps.