facebook rss twitter

e-book pricing probe intensifies

by Sarah Griffiths on 4 August 2010, 15:48

Tags: Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN), Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qazgn

Add to My Vault: x

Agency agreements

Neither Apple nor Amazon as well as the five publishers, namely Simon & Schuster, HarperCollins Publishers, Hachette Book Group, Penguin Group USA and Macmillan commented on the investigation.

Some experts claim the agency model has pushed priced of e-books higher, especially as publishers set the prices which are identical for different websites.

Random House is reportedly the only major publisher to reject the agency pricing model, sticking to an old fashioned wholesale set-up for its digital books. This allows the retailers to set their own prices and gives them the opportunity to undercut their competitors. 

A Random House exec is previously believed to have acknowledged the economic advantages of using a wholesale model, where it receives half the book's cover price irrespective to what the seller charges. 

However, other publishers have said agency pricing allows different booksellers to make a profit from selling books, which could otherwise prove unlikely if a couple of the giants were systematically undercutting other retailers, therefore arguing the model encourages competition.

What is certain is e-book sales are on the rise, boosted by a new generation of e-readers such as Amazon's new Kindle and the arrival of tablets with e-reader capabilities.

According to the Association of American Publishers, e-book sales at 13 publishers have risen 163 percent over a year to over $29m in May. Amazon itself has also recently passed a milestone as Kindle books now outsell hardbacks.



HEXUS Forums :: 3 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Wow, prompt news and new words ….

However, other publishers have said agency pricing allows different booksellers to make a profit from selling books, which could otherwise prove unlikely if a couple of the giants were systematically undercutting other retailers, therefore eargiring the model encourages competition.
:D

Page 2, about three para's up from the end, by the way.

Seriously though, this makes me wonder how long it'll be before authors start working out that they can sell direct, and that, like musicians with record companies, no longer need to give away a large chunk of the earnings from their work to corporate giants.
I'm just surprised that the publishing corps. have hung on as long as they have, especially given their behaviour as they've become more greedy and rob both their clients and customers as well as digging their heals in against electronic content delivery when that's exactly what the public is asking for, and at the same time as the internet has become more and more accessible, no less.

The sooner they go bust, the better.
Saracen
Seriously though, this makes me wonder how long it'll be before authors start working out that they can sell direct, and that, like musicians with record companies, no longer need to give away a large chunk of the earnings from their work to corporate giants.
Roll on that heaven-sent day then. :clapping:

I used to use eReader for a load of eBooks (think I had nearly 100 at one point), then Barnes & Noble took over. Suddenly a lot of the content I like (Dale Brown, Tom Clancy, Star Trek TNG especially Corps of Engineers) became “Only available to subscribers in U.S. and Canada”. B&N's FAQ states that this is due to the publishers. :censored:

Last week when I went on the eReader site, it looks like most of the titles had been removed - certainly I managed to find none of the titles I'd previously bought.

Sad end to what was a good site, not sure whether to blame B&N or the publishers, or a hell-sent combination of the pair… :rant:

Bob