facebook rss twitter

Review: Scan 3XS WI6000 Viz Workstation

by Tarinder Sandhu on 13 November 2017, 14:01

Tags: SCAN, Intel (NASDAQ:INTC), NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qadngb

Add to My Vault: x

Conclusion

...simple to look at but hideously fast on the CPU front and eminently quick through professional graphics applications...

Increasing core counts for modern processors have made the workstation far more capable than ever before. The Intel Core i9-7980XE, for example, supplies 36 threads that Scan's engineers have overclocked to 4.2GHz. The latest iteration of the 3XS WI6000 Viz takes this mammoth horsepower and puts it to good use, smashing through benchmarks at up to four times the speed of a well-overclocked consumer Core i7 PC.

Scan sensibly pairs the potent processor with a quality X299 motherboard, lots of RAM, a fast SSD and a Quadro P4000 from Nvidia. The argument of whether consumer GeForce is a better value bet is decided by the applications you run, and as you have seen in the preceding GPU-centric benchmarks from popular professional software, there's intrinsic merit in opting for ISV-optimised drivers inherent to Quadro.

We'd argue that a Titanium-rated PSU makes more sense when laying out over £4,000 - what's another £75 in this instance? - while, given the overall quietness, we'd prefer a secondary 1TB SSD instead of the mechanical spinner. But these are choices, along with extended warranties, one can make at the point of purchase.

Bottom line: simple to look at but hideously fast on the CPU front and eminently quick through professional graphics applications, the Scan 3XS WI6000 Viz is a beast of a workstation PC, if you can do without ECC memory.

The Good
 
The Bad
18 cores running at 4.2GHz
Supreme CPU performance, never throttles
P4000 much faster than 1080 Ti for pro apps
Remains quiet at all times
 
CPU temps nearing maximum
PSU ought to be Titanium rated



Scan 3XS WI6000 Viz

HEXUS.where2buy

The Scan 3XS WI6000 Viz PCs are available to purchase from Scan Computers.

HEXUS.right2reply

At HEXUS, we invite the companies whose products we test to comment on our articles. If any company representatives for the products reviewed choose to respond, we'll publish their commentary here verbatim.



HEXUS Forums :: 17 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
that is a monster :)

Those are some very very serious numbers :-)
Oh I do love these sorts of ‘biased’ reviews….now I may be a little more critical of these types of reviews because this is the sort of system I use daily for my work.

It would have been better to compare the geforce system using the same cpu as the quadro system because some of those results are likely being cpu limited, let alone the difference twice the ram and ‘faster’ ssd (scratch/temp files etc) can make.

There's also a surprising lack of autodesk software used in the review or is that because apart from Maya they use direct x these days and well the quadro's are no better than their equivalent geforce card there….

I'm also surprised there's no vray/vray rt type benchmarks either and I know they benchmark software available (here's the benchmark) is heavily used in 3D rendered graphics these days.
Looks pretty cool, but it will be better if front panel will be balck.
TBH, I didn't make it past the first paragraph of the review for the sole reason of this:

Run in a uniprocessor environment, there really is no good reason for many workstation users to look past the Core X series or, for that matter, the latest performance Threadripper chips from rival AMD.
While this statement holds true for AMD's ThreadRipper (still hate this name) it in no way holds true for Intel's Core X. No professional in their right mind would be using a Core X series processor to do serious work, because it can't handle ECC memory. Validity of data is of paramount importance in business use.
Deleted
There's also a surprising lack of autodesk software used in the review or is that because apart from Maya they use direct x these days and well the quadro's are no better than their equivalent geforce card there….
.

All the workstations I have used have run Linux, so DirectX seems unlikely ;)

azrael-
No professional in their right mind would be using a Core X series processor to do serious work, because it can't handle ECC memory. Validity of data is of paramount importance in business use.

Agreed, hence I think the overclock on this box is bonkers too. Specially when Intel are shaving the headroom down so much.