facebook rss twitter

Review: Can £250 buy you a decent 24in monitor? We put the LG W2452T to the sword

by Tarinder Sandhu on 21 July 2008, 05:00

Tags: LG W2452T , LG

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaofr

Add to My Vault: x

Image quality and final thoughts

Other nifty, but seemingly pointless, features include an auto-4:3 image - black borders down both sides - that squashes the picture, and photo effects that provide certain tones such as sepia, monochrome, and Gaussian blur. Why would you want this? We're not quite sure. Best of all, that irritating sound can be turned off from this menu.



A separate menu lets you toggle between various modes that, LG reckons, are best-suited for that environment - Movie, Internet, user-defined, and Demo. The difference between the current mode and selected is shown on a side-by-side basis, which is helpful.

Once set to our preferences, static picture quality was reasonably good. Six lamps facilitate an evenly-lit picture with no localised lightspots, but looking at images results in perceivable banding. Whites are displayed cleanly but blacks tend to be wishy-washy and don't quite reach the levels produced by the very best in the business.

Text, too, doesn't appear to be quite as razor-sharp as on a £400 Dell 2408WFP's and quickly pulling a Notepad file to-and-fro highlights the merest whiff of smearing.

It's clear that the retail £255 budget was apportioned towards gimmicky features and screen real estate rather than on pure image quality.

The screen's forte, though, is in playing movies, in Movie mode, which results in a lustrous picture that's imbued with better-than-average colour quality (for this price-point) and no perceivable ghosting.

Fast-paced gaming also doesn't exhibit any obvious foibles that afflict ultra-cheap panels so the LG FLATRON W2452T is good in some respects yet lacks in others, most notably 2D excellence, and this observation holds true even with the keen pricing factored in.

Final thoughts

Budget 24in monitors now begin at around £220, scaling to some £600 for the very highest-specified models. LG's W2452T sits at the lower end of that pricing spectrum and does, at best, a pretty average job. In particular, we'd have preferred a height-adjustable stand and better black gradation, as well as, obviously, removing that noisome banding.

In summary, priced at £255, including VAT, the LG FLATRON W2452T is a lovely-looking monitor that could do with a better panel implementation rather than pointless sounds and image features. If you need 24 inches of screen real estate and budget is key, Dell's E248WFP, priced at £250, would be a better bet, we feel.

HEXUS.certification

The LG FLATRON W2452T monitor passed all of our tests without failure, hence the HEXUS.certification.  This is not a recommendation to buy, however.
Gaming HEXUS Labs

LG FLATRON W2452T


HEXUS Where2Buy

The LG FLATRON W2452T is available for £255 here.

HEXUS Right2Reply

At HEXUS.net, we invite the companies whose products we test to comment on our articles. If LG chooses to respond, we'll publish its commentary here verbatim.


HEXUS Forums :: 7 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Did you test it on ps3 or Xbox 360? Wondering if it can 1:1 pixel mapping. Did it have Vesa wall mount option? I'm considering to buy sister model to this monitor(LG W2452V-PF) with HDMI input but finding these crucial facts seems to be impossible.
I've got the 22“ TV/combo version of this (m228wd) and it's excellent, much better than the samsung it replaced. Would go nicely with your xbox or ps3 as well mate cos it's got hdmi

Just think beyond 19”/20" is a bit excessive because you're having to move your head as well as yours eyes to read the screen though!

Speakers are ****e on mine though, not sure if they're better on this?
5 years on and it's noticeable how little the market has changed. Clearly cheap 1920x1080 LCDs have poisoned innovation in the market. Where are the cheap 2560x1600 displays?
You say that, but you can get a decent 22" IPS monitor for just over £100 now. Okay, so we've not really expanded the market upwards, but at least decent monitors are widely available and cheap now.
The price hike for 1920 x 1200 monitors is what bugs me. I have an ancient 22 inch 1680 x 1050 for the PC. Downstairs is the main TV at 1920 x 1080 with HTPC. Thus my PC is for documents in the main and some gaming To get a useful screen real estate increase for reading documents, rather than watching movies, I need at least the vertical 1200 res to make the purchase worthwhile.

An ‘ideal’ monitor for me would be more like 1920 x 1600