facebook rss twitter

Review: MSI GF65 Thin

by Parm Mann on 12 May 2021, 14:01

Tags: MSI, Intel (NASDAQ:INTC), NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaeqke

Add to My Vault: x

Conclusion

...succeeds in delivering latest-generation 1080p gameplay in a portable form factor that won't break the bank.

In some ways, MSI's GF65 Thin succeeds in delivering latest-generation 1080p gameplay in a portable form factor that won't break the bank.

At a £1,100 price point, the 15.6in laptop combines a hexa-core Intel Core i7 processor with Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop graphics, 16GB of DDR4 memory and a spacious 1TB SSD. Everything the budding gamer needs.

Perhaps, though would-be buyers should be aware of the various limitations. The chassis is a fingerprint magnet, fan noise is really quite bothersome, battery life is poor, and the 144Hz display, while fast, is decidedly average in most other metrics. There may also be question marks surrounding long-term performance; while RTX 3060 Laptop ought to be a fine fit for 1080p gameplay, MSI's restrained 75W implementation is at the lower end of the scale and may struggle with tomorrow's more demanding titles.

Bottom line: the GF65 Thin ticks some of the relevant boxes but with the incoming crop of Ryzen 5000 Series and Intel 11th Gen successors, we'd be inclined to wait it out.

The Good
 
The Bad
Decent gaming performance at 1080p
Fast 144Hz refresh rate
Spacious 1TB SSD
 
Bothersome fan noise
Poor battery life
Display could be brighter


HEXUS.where2buy

The MSI GF65 Thin laptop is available to purchase from Amazon.

HEXUS.right2reply

At HEXUS, we invite the companies whose products we test to comment on our articles. If any company representatives for the products reviewed choose to respond, we'll publish their commentary here verbatim.



HEXUS Forums :: 4 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
What's the point in reviewing a gaming laptop, without benchmarking any games?

Crazy loud, poor battery, sub-par screen. It's easy to see where the corners have been cut.

Edit: Given the benchmark suite listed on the second page (where games are listed), I assume you've mucked up the page order or something and managed to accidently omit them?
We're transitioning to a new gaming suite and have thus benchmarked this in isolation. The bottom of page four has the pertinent details:

'It is in the gaming department that things get interesting, with 3DMark Time Spy suggesting that the 75W RTX 3060 isn't a million miles away from an 80W RTX 3070. How does the synthetic score translate to real-world gaming? We're in the midst of migrating to a new suite of games and have a few titles in contention.

DIRT 5 averages 61fps using the high-quality preset with raytraced shadows enabled. F1 2020 is silky smooth at 100fps with everything cranked to maximum, Final Fantasy XIV: Shadowbringers (cross-comparable with older results) returns 113fps via the maximum preset, and Gears Tactics, with ultra-quality settings, is able to hit an average of 89fps. There's enough power here to ensure in excess of 60fps in all the tested titles, but a higher-power RTX 3060 would be preferable to make the most of the 144Hz display.'
Thanks for the clarification, hadn't spotted that
cptwhite_uk
What's the point in reviewing a gaming laptop, without benchmarking any games?

Crazy loud, poor battery, sub-par screen. It's easy to see where the corners have been cut.

Edit: Given the benchmark suite listed on the second page (where games are listed), I assume you've mucked up the page order or something and managed to accidently omit them?

Indeed - but have you seen the prices these days? Stuff going for more than double s/hand than new….