facebook rss twitter

Review: Packard Bell EasyNote XS20 sub-1kg notebook

by Tarinder Sandhu on 1 February 2008, 08:37

Tags: EasyNote XS20, Packard Bell (TPE:2353), VIA Technologies (TPE:2388)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qalhw

Add to My Vault: x

Usage and final thoughts

The Packard Bell EasyNote XS20 ships with a full-fat copy of Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition. General usage feels a little sluggish, with the hard-drive being the main culprit.



The figures tell all. The average read speed is <20MB/s; random access speed is 34.2ms; and burst speed is only 30.3MB/s. These figures represent less than half the performance associated with larger-capacity (2.5in) drives fitted into most laptops, meaning that portability comes at a rather large performance cost.

We ran a single benchmark from our usual suite - the multi-core-aware DivX encoding test. Arbitrarily comparing to a Dell XPS M1330 - the first that came to hand - running a dual-core Intel Core 2 Duo Mobile T7250 CPU at 2.0GHz, the EasyNote XS20 took 17m 40s to encode the 416MB clip, compared to 3m 2s for the Dell.

But whilst running CPU-intensive applications gives us a look into pure performance, it misses the point somewhat - that's not what the XS20 is all about.

The sub-notebook chugged through the usual spreadsheet and web-surfing activities that it would be expected to encounter on a day-to-day basis.

Putting it to a more-stringent test by initiating playback of a Flash-encoded clip from HEXUS.tv, performance left something to be desired on a file-format used by pervasive YouTube.



The playback load hit 100 per cent on a consistent basis and resulted in a stuttering experience, even though the VIA C7-M processor did effectively clock up to 1.2GHz when placed under load. Compare this with a 15-20 per cent load for the Dell XPS M1330.

Final thoughts

Based on VIA's reference NanoBook design and weighing in at only 933g, including four-cell battery, the £349.99 Packard Bell EasyNote XS20 seems to have the mobility boxes ticket when evaluated at first glance. This supposition appears to be corroborated when looking at the battery-life statistics and excellent, if somewhat low-resolution, screen.

Digging deeper and cracks in its armour become apparent. The slow-spinning hard-drive reduces Windows XP to, at times, a crawl, and the VIA C7-M processor makes heavy weather of running Flash-encoded clips without stuttering. While we're at it, the keyboard could do with an ergonomic make-over, too.

We'd be able to overlook many of these foibles if, like the £220 (Linux-based) ASUS Eee 4GiB PC, the price was more competitive. However, even at £349.99, and appreciating that it ships with a complete operating system, the XS20 competes against a range of more-powerful 2kg laptops whose feature-set is far more compelling.

We reckon that Packard Bell will still sell a significant number of EasyNote XS20s, borne from the simple fact that it's so damn portable, but we reckon a processor upgrade is in order for it to take advantage of the immersive nature of the Web in 2008.

Bottom line: superbly portable and well-built, the Packard Bell EasyNote XS20 isn't quite the panacea to the mobile warrior's computing woes. It's a little too expensive, underpowered, and, frankly, slow for it to receive an outright recommendation to buy.


HEXUS.certification

Essentials HEXUS Labs

Packard Bell EasyNote XS20


HEXUS Where2Buy

The Packard Bell Easy Note XS20 is available for £349.99 from PC World.

HEXUS.tv

If words just aren't enough for you, head on over the HEXUS.tv for an illuminating look.

HEXUS Right2Reply

At HEXUS.net, we invite the companies whose products we test to comment on our articles. If any the Packard Bell/VIA's representatives choose to do so, we'll publish their responses here verbatim.



HEXUS Forums :: 2 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Well and truly whupped by the Eee :D
HEXUS
Read more.
Interesting article - thank you. I wouldn't say I'd be in the market for this particular model - mainly bcs I don't like the fact they've “cropped” the screen. It shows that the market for UMPCs with kebyoards is going in the right direction. You didn't mention tablet ability, so one has to assume there isn't any.

I've always like Sony's VGN series, although I've never actually got around to buying one. Again, they don't let the screen fill “right to the edge”, surely essential for design/practicality in such a small system?

The models I like especially have slate functionality (fold keyboard away), whilst also being able to use the keyboard when required, with the screen at any angle between 0deg (in theory - as it would be “closed”) to 180deg.

I know I'm fussy, but well, who isn't?