facebook rss twitter

Review: HIS X1300 512MiB HyperMemory with 128MiB DDR2 x1 PCIe

by Tarinder Sandhu on 6 July 2006, 14:24

Tags: HiS Graphics

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaf7g

Add to My Vault: x

Final thoughts, awards, HEXUS.right2reply

Final thoughts, awards, HEXUS Right2Reply

Let's state the obvious first. The HIS X1300 512MiB HyperMemory with 128MiB GDDR2 x1 PCIe graphics card isn't a gaming goliath. A combination of low-end architecture and bandwidth-starved HyperMemory support leaves it trailing, quite considerably, behind a regular Radeon X1300 Pro 256MiB card. If HIS wants to enhance the performance of this card, outfitting it with a greater level of onboard memory will help. It bears repeating that HyperMemory simply isn't suited to delivering performance if constricted by a low-bandwidth (x1 PCIe) link.

Even though it struggled with a gamut of games at 1024x768, it's still faster than ATI's Radeon Xpress 1100 integrated graphics in every test, and the very fact that you can install it into a x1 PCIe slot is hugely beneficial for consumers whose motherboards don't sport a discrete x16 PCIe slot and who are looking for a card to play the odd game now and then.

We'd recommend turning the resolution down to 800x600 for better framerates, and, looking back at performance, we can also infer that's it is faster than any older generation integrated GPU - Intel's GMA900, for example. However, and this is important to understand and appreciate, we cannot recommend this as a £50 pure gaming card because it's simply not fast enough. An X1300 Pro would be preferable.

Avivo technology is also a definite bonus on a budget card, and the half-height PCB lends itself to smaller cases (HTPC, for example). The X1300 architecture is also Vista Premium-Ready, fully supporting the advanced effects in Microsoft's long-awaited O.S.

Ideally, then, the HIS X1300 512MiB HyperMemory with 128MiB GDDR2 x1 PCIe shouldn't be evaluated in performance terms. It's a SKU that's been designed with a specific market in mind, and having a x1 PCIe interface opens up a vast array of possibilities. We'd stick one in a svelte media center PC or add it in as a secondary card for greater output connectivity.

£50 or so will buy you a faster graphics accelerator from ATI or NVIDIA, but they can't match the versatility of HIS' X1300 x1 PCIe card. A product for a market that requires flexibility more than pure pixel-pushing power. Recommended if you need graphics output from a x1 PCIe slot, then.

Had the board been equipped with an HDMI connector we'd have given it a HEXUS.labs media award. As it is, we reckon that it has enough going for it to deserve an essentials innovation gong.

Innovation - HEXUS.labs
HIS X1300 512MiB HyperMemory with 128MiB GDDR2 x1 PCIe


HEXUS Right2Reply

At HEXUS.net, we invite the companies whose products we test to comment on our articles. If HIS' representatives choose to do so, we'll publish their commentary here verbatim.



HEXUS Forums :: 24 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!




That low profile bracket looks very usefull, I rember a while back having to run an nVidia card without it's bracket in a low profile PC because the card was low profile but the bracket was not.

It would be nice though if they supplied two seperate brackets instead of one double with one, as that way you can move the second VGA port so that it does not block a motherboard slot you want to use. There might also be situations where the case only has room for a single width card, and the double with bracket would prevent the card from fitting.
For gamaig, useless, for running triple or even quad displays running with a faster main card :D Without losing a precious PCI slot.

Wonder how ati nividia drivers react when installed at the same time.
A few comments/ questions for Tarinder. I do realise that spending days in the lab analysing a low-end card is unrealistic, however:

1. Was the HIS card running with it's own 128MB of RAM and another 128 via Hypermemory?
2. In any case, 512MB of system ram seems unrealistically low even for a budget system, since you can get a gig of PC4200 for under £50.
3. When I first played Far Cry it would stutter with 512MB of system RAM even with none being taken for graphics purposes. I'd suggest that the truly sucky scores for the HIS card and onboard graphics could well be a result of a severe system memory shortage.
4. Overclocking scores? DDR2 at 500MHz Effective (I.E. 4GB/S bandwidth on a 64bit bus) would seem to me to be quite ridiculously underclocked. Were you able to squeeze more speed out of it?
chuckskull
For gamaig, useless, for running triple or even quad displays running with a faster main card :D Without losing a precious PCI slot.
Agreed, though I wonder if windows, or the driver has a limit on the number of cards or displays it can cope with. Some boards have 3 PCIe slots, so if you stuff a system with three of these, and two regular PCIe x16 cards, you get 10 displays. Clearly not that usefull for most people, but for some niche markets, like city traders, or running loads of sign boards in an airport it could be realy usefull.

chuckskull
Wonder how ati nividia drivers react when installed at the same time.
Most of the review sites tried that when the first SLI boards came out, there is no problem, with running ati & nvidia cards together, and the drivers (and windows) copes just fine.
Hi, Rave. I'll try to answer your questions

1. Was the HIS card running with it's own 128MB of RAM and another 128 via Hypermemory?

Yes, that was the case. Had the system been equipped with 1GiB of RAM, HyperMemory's ‘contribution’ would have risen to 384MiB, or 512MiB once the onboard card memory has been factored in.


2. In any case, 512MB of system ram seems unrealistically low even for a budget system, since you can get a gig of PC4200 for under £50.

We've taken a look at low-end PCs from a number of vendors and found that £399 - £499 PCs tend to ship with 512MiB of RAM. RAM pricing fluctuates enough for vendors to offer 1GiB as an upgrade.

3. When I first played Far Cry it would stutter with 512MB of system RAM even with none being taken for graphics purposes. I'd suggest that the truly sucky scores for the HIS card and onboard graphics could well be a result of a severe system memory shortage.

I'd agree, but the reason for using 512MiB of RAM is to keep it as real-world as possible. I'm sure the scores would go up with 1GiB, but will most users who buy this card for a spare PCIe slot be running that? I'm not so sure.

4. Overclocking scores? DDR2 at 500MHz Effective (I.E. 4GB/S bandwidth on a 64bit bus) would seem to me to be quite ridiculously underclocked. Were you able to squeeze more speed out of it?

We don't tend to overclock low-end SKUs. However, I'll get back to you with tentative overclocking results tomorrow.

Thanks.