facebook rss twitter

Review: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 vs. AMD Radeon HD 5850 CrossFire - battle at £450

by Tarinder Sandhu on 5 April 2010, 05:00

Tags: AMD (NYSE:AMD), ATi Technologies (NYSE:AMD), NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaxp5

Add to My Vault: x

Final thoughts

We review the latest hardware with a view of advising you, dear reader, which hardware is worthy of consideration. NVIDIA recent soft launch of the two Fermi-based GPUs has given us a fuller picture on the options available in the discrete graphics market and how each card compares against one another.

Looking at the high end of the market in particular, the Radeon HD 5850 makes a very strong case for best current GPU in the £200-£250 sector, helped by competing against two-year-old NVIDIA technology.

Bump up the graphics budget to £300 and the all-new GeForce GTX 470 and Radeon HD 5870 vie for your money, in the UK at least. Our pick right now would be the Radeon HD 5870, because it offers, on balance, more performance, lower power-draw and a quieter cooler.

The GeForce GTX 480 is due to hit etailers with a projected price of £450. The extra 50 per cent outlay isn't realised in linear performance gains and it can struggle to fend off Radeon HD 5870 in some cases. Go the whole nine yards and a £550 Radeon HD 5970 can be yours, offering the highest performance we've ever seen from a single card.

But you can spend £400-plus one more than just one card. Now answering the question on the first page, team two Radeon HD 5850s together, totalling the same £450 as a single GeForce GTX 480, and performance is significantly improved in our range of benchmarks. Indeed, we'd also question the need to spend the extra £100 on a HD 5970, if you have a CrossFire-compatible motherboard.

The GeForce GTX 480 isn't a bad GPU by any means, but its pricing brings a compelling dual-card solution from AMD into play. The sweet etail listing of Radeon HD 5850 and thoroughly decent scaling in CrossFireX means that it becomes even more difficult to make an objective case for the GeForce GTX 480 as a gaming card and, to a slightly lesser extent, the Radeon HD 5970.

NVIDIA will weigh in with arguments in favour of PhysX, SLI scaling, 3D Vision Surround, and a future-looking architecture. They're all valid to some degree, but, right now, they'd be more than offset by power/temperature/heat/noise concerns that are plaguing the GeForce 4x0 GPUs.

Bottom line: AMD's Radeon HD 5850 should continue to be a hot seller. It owns the sub-£250 space and a two-card setup is an alluring option that gives GeForce GTX 480 serious pause for thought. Got £500 to spend on a graphics? Buy two Radeon HD 5850s and a top gaming title.

We'll be conducting the same test with two GeForce GTX 470s in the very near future, compared against dual Radeon HD 5870s, amongst others, so stay tuned for that.





HEXUS Forums :: 45 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
At the moment, two HD5850's just makes more sense on every level. (imo) No-one but the die-hard Nvidia fanbois are going to pay that kind of cash just for one card, especially those who are worried about next-gen DX11 performance.
I think sapphire should make a 5850 X2 (just like the 4850 X2) and a similar style cooler.
Last nail in the coffin for Nvidia 4XX series?

No mater how you spin this, there is no way some “magical driver” optimization could ever close the monumental gap in performance we are seeing here. For the same price, the 5850XF just trounce the 480 in every games, at all resolutions while taking less power, runs cooler with less noise. The worse part for Nvidia is that they have no margin to reduce prices. ATI, plenty and they don't even need to! Talk about being stuck between a rock and a hard place!

Also, even when the 5870 “lose” to the 480, the 5870 still pull like 90-125 FPS. Who care to run at 90 instead of 150 FPS when you can save 100$, 155W and 13c??? Especially when in all other games, it's a virtual tie. The data clearly demonstrate that the 480 is an irrelevant piece of hardware, even when compared to a 5870. If it's true for the 480, it's even more so for the 470. Both the 5850 and the 5870 are better choices than the 470 in term of price/power/heat/noise VS performance ratio.

A 5950 and a 5890 would be a death sentence, over the already pronounced death sentence provided by this review! Nvidia is clearly in deep sh*t. They have no choice: They must come back VERY quickly with a full 512sp GTX490 that can run at over 700Mhz, below 90c and way below 50db. The problem is, I don't think an A3 silicon stepping could pull this off. What then? Wait 3-6 months for A4 or even A5 steeping? Or worse, wait at LEAST 12-18 months for a 28nm die shrink? (TSMC completely scrapped the 32nm node and 28nm is all but ready).

Both scenarios are hopeless for Nvidia anyway. Even if ATI's original “Northern islands” new architecture will have to wait until TSMC has sorted out its 28nm mess, no sooner than Q2 2011 as it seems, they are still coming with an hybrid update @ 40nm named “Southern islands” in Q3 2010, or about 6 months from now. Apparently, this new chip has already tapped out! (Only rumors, but considering ATI recent track record, probably true). Even if by miracle Nvidia pull this off and produce a full Fermi with thermal under control, Southern islands will decimate it before 2010 is out.
Hahahahahahahahahhahaha.. *choke*.. hahahahaha… heeeiihh

Well, if you work out the economics in Asia now, 5850 is even more of a better deal, they're selling it for spot on USD250 in south east asia..

Anyone on a holiday there should definitely bag 2 of them. (I was on holiday there, but sadly I could only bag 1 sapphire version)… If it works out nicely over the money changer, under £340
Only about £175 in HK, would be a lot better if the Pound wasnt so fail, swear this is the lowest I have seen it in years :(