facebook rss twitter

Review: Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 Vapor-X 512MB: last throw of the RV770 dice

by Tarinder Sandhu on 20 March 2009, 13:26 3.5

Tags: Radeon HD 4850 512MB Vapor-X, Sapphire, PC

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qari2

Add to My Vault: x

Final thoughts, and rating

Sapphire's new Radeon HD 4850 Vapor-X 512MB is released just before the launch of a revised number of mid-range GPUs from ATI. The Vapor-X version uses Sapphire's in-house-designed cooler that works, and works well, beating the pants off the reference design in noise, power and thermal performance, albeit at the spatial cost of a second expansion slot, thanks to the double-height cooler.

Exhibiting the same out-of-the-box graphics performance as a reference-clocked Radeon HD 4850, the Vapor-X, shipping with an SRP of £139.99, is up against some serious competition in the custom-cooled Radeon HD 4850 space, which includes the ASUS Radeon HD 4850 Matrix 512MB and Sapphire's very own Zalman-cooled TOXIC.

Most people take a cursory glimpse at 3D benchmark results and pass judgement. Sapphire know that it won't win any speed awards with this card and the value proposition looks decidedly shaky appreciating the ~£30 premium over reference cards, but the Vapor-X is aimed at a different market - one that values a lack of noise and good thermals to be equally as important as pure frame-rate throughput.

A niche product for a certain type of customer, the Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 Vapor-X 512MB's appeal is obvious but limited. Most others would spend the money on the cheaper but better-performing XFX Radeon HD 4850 XXX or dole out the same cash for the faster Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 512MB. Bringing the Vapor-X range to market, Sapphire does one thing very well: giving the consumer choice.

Pros

Much better cooling and aural performance than on the reference card
Should provide excellent gaming with 1,680x1,050 TFT panels
Integrated HDMI is a bonus
Better-than-average power-consumption figures

Cons

Double-height cooler may cause some issues if folks want to position it in a SFF box
XFX, ASUS, et al, all have compelling solutions at a matching price-point

HEXUS Rating

HEXUS.net scores products out of 100%, taking into account technology, implementation, stability, performance, value, customer care and desirability. A score for an average-rated product is a meaningful ‘50%’, and not ‘90%’, which is common practice for a great many other publications.

We consider any product score above '50%' as a safe buy. The higher the score, the higher the recommendation from HEXUS to buy. Simple, straightforward buying advice.

The rating is given in relation to the category the component competes in, therefore the card is evaluated with respect to our 'mid-range components' criteria.

70%

Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 Vapor-X 512MB

HEXUS Where2Buy

TBC.

HEXUS Right2Reply

At HEXUS, we invite the companies whose products we test to comment on our articles. If any company representatives for the products reviewed choose to respond, we'll publish their commentary here verbatim.



HEXUS Forums :: 7 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
A nice looking card, cool and quiet when idle and gives good performance when needed. The output's are a smart choice allowing for 2 monitors to be connected leaving the HDMI for HDTV, which is how I like my displays connected.

Switching the VGA output for a DVI output would be even better or another HDMI output if 2x DVI takes up too much space. If 2x HDMI is used people needing VGA could use a DVI-VGA adapter and people needing 2x DVI could purchase a HDMI-DVI cable/adapter, this would allow two monitors to be connected in digital with a HDMI out for a HDTV.
hey
I have been following the price / performance wars closely lately, From what i have seen in recent reviews the XFX 4850 card beats many others on peformance especially the new Sapphire Vapor-X offering, and scan now have the XFX card at £103, the vapor X is £140+ i believe, and i dont personally think the extra option of HDMI on the vapor X warrants the extra £40? Do you?
3DWizard
scan now have the XFX card at £103, the vapor X is £140+ i believe…
I'd be very wary about relying *purely* on price as a guide, especially since there don't seem to be any Vapour-X cards “in the wild” yet. The XFX XXX 4850 @ scan is certainly a massive bargain: I can only assume that XFX cut their channel pricing just as Scan put in a new order. It's quite possible that in 2 - 4 weeks we'll see Vapour-X 4850s at ~ £125 and the XFX cards coming backup to ~ £115, as channel pricing and the exchange rates do their usual merry little dance. Don't forget that the official word on pricing of the Vapour-X series is “between the stock versions and the toxic”: Ebuyer currently have Sapphire's stock 4850 @ £124 and the Toxic version @ £142, so the Vapour-X is more likely to be just over £130.

Besides, ask around the graphics / hardware forums here and you'll find a lot of people have had poor experiences of XFXs reliability / support / customer service. You pay for more than just the technology when you buy a graphics card…
ScaryJim - you are either employed By Sapphire or ‘their Channel’ or their biggest ever fan, and never had to return a product to them!!!

I have - i had to return an old Radeon card to my retailer i brought the card from, they then demanded original proof of purchase from me, although the card was nearly 18 months old, and then said i needed to wait for a card to be serviced, when i finally did receive the card back it was a refurbed card replacement - which i kicked off about, only to be told that this is in the terms and conditions of their RMA support…

so if you ask me, especially when my wallets being hit at the moment, i would go for the XFX card.

Unless i get a job like yours where i dont have to worry about things like the above.
neither a Sapphire employee nor their biggest fan: however I've never had to return a card to them (although, to be fair, I've only ever bought 2 Sapphire cards). I was just going by what people said in the forums - i.e. XFX products tend towards unreliability and XFX do not give good customer service.

If you want balance, I've also had 2 XFX Graphics cards in the past, one of which had such inadequate cooling that I had to buy a PCI slot exhaust blower to stop it crashing as soon as you put any 3D load onto it.

There you go, happy now?!? ;)