facebook rss twitter

Review: Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 Nitro+

by Tarinder Sandhu on 15 December 2017, 14:01

Tags: Sapphire

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qadoro

Add to My Vault: x

Conclusion

Sapphire really could not have done more to make RX Vega 64 better, and if this cooler was on an Nvidia card it would most likely be the best around.

The AMD Radeon RX Vega GPU was a long time in coming, and it has taken another four months or so for a custom Sapphire card to show up. It's been much-needed, too, as the reference model has been plagued by high temperatures and a noisy fan.

The Nitro+ is that card. Massive in size and looking to tame RX Vega via the most heavy-duty air cooling we've seen from the company, it's a beautiful card with plenty of attention to detail, from the restrained RGB lighting and excellent construction, to relatively low noise at full pelt.

Sapphire really could not have done more to make RX Vega 64 better, and if this cooler was on an Nvidia card it would most likely be one of the better ones available. However, at £650 or so, verging on GeForce GTX 1080 Ti money, the hot and bothered RX Vega 64, no matter how well cooled, simply cannot cut it in such elevated company.

Bottom line: there are better performing GPUs at this price point, but if you insist on Vega, then Nitro+ is about as well as you can do.

The Good
 
The Bad
Well suited to smooth QHD gaming
Excellent construction
RGB implemented well
Runs cool and quiet under load
 
Price
3x 8-pin connectors
Poor overclocking potential



Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 Nitro+

HEXUS.where2buy*

The Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 Nitro+ is available to purchase from Scan Computers.

HEXUS.right2reply

At HEXUS, we invite the companies whose products we test to comment on our articles. If any company representatives for the products reviewed choose to respond, we'll publish their commentary here verbatim.



*UK-based HEXUS community members are eligible for free delivery and priority customer service through the SCAN.care@HEXUS forum.



HEXUS Forums :: 14 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
I don't know what's more disturbing, the price or the fact that there will be people out there that will pay it and be convinced it was money well spent.
Page Nine seems to be mislabelled guys, apart from that another good review.

Interesting to see that despite 3x 8 pin power on the board that overclocking is still shocking.

I wonder what in the process of the GPU manufacture is holding that back? Is this a GloFo fabricated part?
So that was with the old drivers, not the new Adrenalin version?

Edit: not that I intend spending £600 on a gpu, but would like to know how much difference it makes.
DanceswithUnix
So that was with the old drivers, not the new Adrenalin version?

Edit: not that I intend spending £600 on a gpu, but would like to know how much difference it makes.

Saw a site yesterday (sorry it was a link from elsewhere so can't remember which one) and with the new Adrenalin drivers there was 1 to 2 FPS gain in some titles and some ran worse, maybe a game patch or driver updates in the future might make more difference.
Been hard to swallow but this still appears the one bad move AMD made this year. Just appears they couldn't get everything to sit together well and HBM2 appears to have been hit with high cost and poor yields thus scuppering them in many ways