facebook rss twitter

Review: AMD Ryzen 7 1700X (14nm Zen)

by Parm Mann on 3 March 2017, 14:00

Tags: AMD (NYSE:AMD)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qadevg

Add to My Vault: x

Conclusion

Benchmarks are within touching distance of the range-topping 1800X and the balance of price and performance ought to give Intel food for thought.

The launch of AMD's Ryzen processor is a significant milestone in the company's history. Such is the importance of the Zen architecture that it makes sense to step back and consider how much progress AMD has made.

This time last week, the chip manufacturer couldn't hold a candle to Intel in the high-end desktop space. The venerable Core processor has gone unchallenged for many years, and AMD's best attempts have been power-hungry parts based on ill-conceived architectures that, aside from price, have struggled to compete in any meaningful metric.

Zen is here to change all that, and while AMD won't recover lost ground overnight, it is now closer to Intel than it has been for some time. Built from the ground-up and designed to erase any memory of previous-generation parts, Ryzen shows vastly improved single-thread performance, the initial eight-core CPUs offer massive multi-thread potential, the updated AM4 platform provides all of the mod cons you'd expect, and power consumption has been reduced considerably.

Few would have bet on AMD making all the above happen in early 2017, yet despite significant signs of progress, the lingering question remains: has Ryzen done enough? Single-thread performance, while improved, still isn't a match for Intel, and the need for software optimisation in modern games puts another wrinkle into the mix.

AMD has nonetheless taken a giant leap, and while there's still work to be done, the Zen architecture has brought a renewed sense of excitement to the high-end desktop PC. Never before has this level of multi-core prowess been available at such competitive price points, and we look forward with genuine interest to the quad-core Ryzen parts to come in Q2.

Bottom line: the Ryzen 7 1700X, at £390, is easily one of AMD's best processors to date. Benchmarks are within touching distance of the range-topping 1800X and the balance of price and performance ought to give Intel food for thought. At the very least, the Core i7-6900K, at £1,000, now seems all the more outrageous.

The Good
 
The Bad
8 cores, 16 threads for under £400
Impressive multi-core performance
Almost every bit as fast as the 1800X
Wide range of modern AM4 boards
Vastly improved power consumption
Gives Intel food for thought
 
Single-thread is good but not great
Gaming optimisations still needed
Limited overclocking potential



AMD Ryzen 7 1700X

HEXUS.where2buy*

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X is available to purchase from Scan Computers.

HEXUS.right2reply

At HEXUS, we invite the companies whose products we test to comment on our articles. If any company representatives for the products reviewed choose to respond, we'll publish their commentary here verbatim.



*UK-based HEXUS community members are eligible for free delivery and priority customer service through the SCAN.care@HEXUS forum.



HEXUS Forums :: 36 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Also a note to perspective buyers - the people over on XS forums tested the various models. At the same voltages the R7 1700 consumes less power than a R7 1700X or R7 1800X.

This hints that the R7 1700 is a lower leakage chip according to them and will be the better buy for most people. At least for a lot of non-gaming work the Core i7 6900K looks massively overpriced.
As far as I'm concerned, I reel like this review, of the 1700x, has successfully sold a lot of 1700's!

Super interesting looking scaling!
Well at a couple of hundred quid cheaper than my 5930K it looks like much better value for money. Although I was somehow hoping for more.

All academic for me as it's a good few years until I'll be upgrading again.
Jowsey
As far as I'm concerned, I reel like this review, of the 1700x, has successfully sold a lot of 1700's!

Super interesting looking scaling!

The R7 1700 is the star - it consumes less power at 4GHZ apparently than a R7 1700X or R7 1800X.
Hexus - how good was the XFR? did it mean that it was boosting to the same level as the 1800X when it was boosting too or did it come in lower even with the same cooler?