facebook rss twitter

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT BIOS reveals more about Rage mode

by Mark Tyson on 5 November 2020, 11:11

Tags: AMD (NYSE:AMD)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaephd

Add to My Vault: x

During the late October special AMD event, which focussed upon the RDNA 2 architecture and a trio of Radeon RX 6000 Series graphics cards, we first heard about Rage mode. It was described during the presentation as basically being a 'one-click' overclocking mode. Moreover, AMD shared gaming benchmarks which sometimes included this mode or profile. As the editor noted, it didn't seem particularly fair for AMD to share its first official peeks at performance with overclocking applied.

Now thanks to Igor Wallossek and Patrick Schur we have gained some insight into what Rage mode actually does, and find that it is just one of four presets available as evidenced by an AMD partner's Radeon RX 6800XT BIOS.

On his Igor's Lab blog, Wallossek explains that four modes dubbed Quiet, Balanced, Rage and Turbo Mode can be seen in the BIOS code and "this presetting is implemented via the power limit, the target temperature and the fan control with Acoustic Limit and Target (RPM)". He takes the opportunity to plug his own MorePowerTool (MPT) software which can manipulate the AMD SoftPowerPlayTables for the same effect, and the UI clearly shows the modes in the screenshot below.

As you can see, the power limit minimum is between zero and six per cent (not sure about max variances between the rpesets), target temps are set at between 80 and 95°C, and fan profiles adjusted by the AMD partner to suit the cooling solution provided. Wallossek says the Rage mode would take a 300W reference card into 320W territory. Meanwhile he is a bit worried by Turbo mode and its 95°C limit.

 


HEXUS Forums :: 15 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
95c feels really unnecessary. I mean, obviously they're the experts, they build em etc. but surely that can't be good for longevity
It will depend on how it is implemented as to whether the 95C turbo limit is a cause for concern. If it's a standard feature, employed as default or just a switch with no warnings - problem.

If it's defaulted off, on the advanced settings and trying to turn it on gives you a warning that this is for playing about only, will likely reduce the lifespan of your card and voids any warranty, who cares? It's effectively auto-overclocking for people who want to push it at that stage. I for one hate it when manufacturers limit what I can do with my own card. As long as it's made clear it's at your own risk and you take full responsibility for it, who cares?

Far better than locking it all down and saying “no, you can't overclock our chips because we don't want people willing to put the time and effort into it to get better value…”

EDIT: Also, it's essential that this turbo mode is not enabled for cards being benched and disabled for shipping. Reviewers must check that to ensure we are not seeing performance which is classed as outside of the normal operational conditions and effectively voiding a warranty if attained by buyers.
philehidiot
Reviewers must check that to ensure we are not seeing performance which is classed as outside of the normal operational conditions

Like Intel's endless turbo mode?
edmundhonda
Like Intel's endless turbo mode?

Or the gaming of benchmarks by mobile phone manufacturers.
So RAGE mode basically makes it almost as good as a standard Nvidia card, and slightly better in the odd game here and there?
That's like Banner transforming into The Hulk, but only being able to destroy you in a game of tiddly winks!! :lol:

Perhaps it should be renamed Minor Furtherance…

philehidiot
As long as it's made clear it's at your own risk and you take full responsibility for it, who cares?
I thought they started locking cards because people were overclocking them to breaking point and claiming warranty refunds (as you might expect from an overclockable GPU), and the issue was that the claims for damage done by implementing blatantly unsafe user-end settings were actually being upheld by the governing bodies?