facebook rss twitter

AMD's UVC to combat Intel's Atom and VIA's Nano

by Parm Mann on 10 September 2008, 11:12

Tags: AMD (NYSE:AMD)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qapbi

Add to My Vault: x

There's no mistaking that Intel's Atom is where the ultra-portable action is, and VIA's impressive Nano has done little to impact Intel's netbook dominance.

Intel's other big-name rival, AMD, may have more luck with the launch of its Ultra-Value Client (UVC) solutions. According to the following leaked slides from CHW.net, AMD is lining up its Atom-offensive with a series of low-power, low-cost chips aimed at delivering a desktop-like experience in an el-cheapo system.

The two UVC processors revealed are the 22W 1.5GHz AMD Athlon X2 3250e and the 15W 1.6GHz AMD Athlon 2650e. The chips use the familiar AM2 socket for desktop use, but the slide reveals that similar models for AMD's mobile S1G1 socket are also available.

The chips will be OEM-only, and reports suggest that they'll reach the market as soon as December in systems from ASUS, Acer and Shuttle.

According to the slide, the chips will be paired with AMD's 65nm 740 chipset - so we can expect a single PCI-E slot in desktop configurations, or a DirectX 9 IGP in portable systems.

A second slide hints at AMD's marketing strategy; Intel's Atom provides a sub-traditional PC experience, and AMD hopes to rectify that with its more-capable UVC solutions.



HEXUS Forums :: 6 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
OEM only?! does this mean we will not be able to buy them at all or will we see ones fixed to motherboards being sold because it think one of these with an IGP would make a fantastic media server/centre… iv been waiting for ages for the perfect solution.
Agreed. This is pretty much the perfect HTPC box… just so long as there's a way of using a PCI/PCIe TV tuner and the graphics are half decent (780g sort of standard).
this_is_gav
Agreed. This is pretty much the perfect HTPC box… just so long as there's a way of using a PCI/PCIe TV tuner and the graphics are half decent (780g sort of standard).

Definately, although for them to release such a CPU+chipset+IGP solution i think they would have to work on the power consumption of the 780/740G chipsets quite a bit otherwise they face the similar problem to the atom + 945 chipset with regards to unbalance.
I like where the line is drawn, over the Atom but under the AMD offerings.

The thing is what do people use these netbooks for, if its just web browsing and the likes then the AMD chip draws too much power and offers nice features that are not really of much use to a netbook users, HTPC yes, netbook no.

IMHO of course…
'[GSV
Trig;1518487']I like where the line is drawn, over the Atom but under the AMD offerings.

The thing is what do people use these netbooks for, if its just web browsing and the likes then the AMD chip draws too much power and offers nice features that are not really of much use to a netbook users, HTPC yes, netbook no.

IMHO of course…

I would probably agree here although i think many people will use their netbooks for some multimedia playback + as we have seen with the atom we need to wait for the chipset to see what the real life power consumption is like. It seems each company has taken a slightly different angle on the netbook CPU thing:
This is kind of speculation and opinion so feel free to correct me

Intel atom - super low power consumption and limited functionality at low price
Via C8 nano - Low power consumption and some functionality at a cost(??)
AMD UVC - not so fantastic power consumption with good functionality at low price