
Today's arrival of the Radeon R9 Fury has brought some much-needed competition to the high-end GPU marketplace. Nvidia's GTX 900-series has had it too good for too long, and though the green team still holds the single-GPU performance crown, renewed focus from the folks in red has both sides jostling for position in the high-end space.
The last few months have seen a flurry of activity with regards to high-profile launches, and enthusiasts now have at least half-a-dozen options to choose from.
GeForce GTX Titan X  | 
      Radeon R9 Fury X  | 
      GeForce GTX 980 Ti  | 
      Radeon R9 Fury  | 
      GeForce GTX 980  | 
      Radeon R9 390X  | 
      |
| Launch date | March 2015  | 
      June 2015  | 
      June 2015  | 
      July 2015  | 
      September 2014  | 
      June 2015  | 
      
| Codename | GM200  | 
     Fiji XT  | 
     GM200  | 
     Fiji Pro  | 
     GM204  | 
     Grenada XT  | 
     
| DX support | 12.1  | 
     12.0  | 
     12.1  | 
     12.0  | 
     12.1  | 
     12.0  | 
     
| Process (nm) | 28  | 
      28  | 
      28  | 
      28  | 
      28  | 
      28  | 
      
| Transistors (mn) | 8,000  | 
      8,900  | 
      8,000  | 
      8,900  | 
      5,200  | 
      6,200  | 
      
| Approx Die Size (mm²) | 601  | 
    596  | 
    601  | 
    596  | 
    398  | 
    438  | 
    
| Full implementation of die | Yes  | 
     Yes  | 
     No  | 
     No  | 
     Yes  | 
     Yes  | 
     
| Processors | 3,072  | 
      4,096  | 
      2,816  | 
      3,584  | 
      2,048  | 
      2,816  | 
      
| Texture Units | 192  | 
     256  | 
     172  | 
     224  | 
     128  | 
     176  | 
     
| ROP Units | 96  | 
      64  | 
      96  | 
      64  | 
      64  | 
      64  | 
      
| Peak GPU Clock/Boost (MHz) | 1,076  | 
      1,050  | 
      1,076  | 
      1,000  | 
      1,216  | 
      1,050  | 
      
| Peak GFLOPS (SP) | 6,611  | 
     8,602  | 
     6,060  | 
     7,168  | 
     4,981  | 
     5,914  | 
     
| Peak GFLOPS (DP) | 207  | 
     537  | 
     189  | 
     448  | 
     156  | 
     739  | 
     
| Memory Clock (MHz) | 7,012  | 
      1,000  | 
      7,012  | 
      1,000  | 
      7,012  | 
      6,000  | 
      
| Memory Bus (bits) | 384  | 
      4,096  | 
      384  | 
      4,096  | 
      256  | 
      512  | 
      
| Max bandwidth (GB/s) | 336  | 
     512  | 
     336  | 
     512  | 
     224  | 
     384  | 
     
| Default memory size (MB) | 12,288  | 
    4,096  | 
    6,144  | 
    4,096  | 
    4,096  | 
    8,192  | 
    
| Memory type | GDDR5  | 
    HBM  | 
    GDDR5  | 
    HBM  | 
    GDDR5  | 
    GDDR5  | 
    
| Power Connectors | 8+6-pin  | 
      8+8-pin  | 
      8+6-pin  | 
      8+8-pin  | 
      6+6-pin  | 
      8+6-pin  | 
      
| TDP (watts) | 250  | 
      275  | 
      250  | 
      275  | 
      165  | 
      275  | 
      
| GFLOPS per watt | 26.44  | 
    31.28  | 
    24.24  | 
    26.06  | 
    30.19  | 
    21.50  | 
    
| Launch MSRP | $999  | 
      $649  | 
      $649  | 
      $549  | 
      $549  | 
      $429  | 
      
If your wallet is deep enough, you'll likely agree: the high-end GPU line-up has never looked so tantalising. And it's important that neither manufacturer has it all their own way.
The launch of AMD's Fury products - in particular the R9 Fury at around £450 - appears to have had an immediate impact on GeForce pricing. Indeed, a quick scout around UK retailers reveals that GTX 980 Ti has dipped below the £500 mark, while GTX 980 has conveniently tumbled to £360.
Choice is most definitely a good thing, so given the options and your own personal budget, which GPU, if any, would you choose? Share your thoughts and reasoning using the comments facility below.

            
            
            
                
                    
                