facebook rss twitter

BT reprimanded for “free” broadband offer

by Mark Tyson on 16 January 2013, 17:19

Tags: British Telecom (LON:BT.A)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qabrob

Add to My Vault: x

The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has reprimanded BT for advertising broadband and home phone bundles the telecoms company said were available “free for six months”. In fact the line rental payment of £14.60 per month was payable from the first say of the contract, only the £13 a month broadband fee was waived for six months.

A BT print advert under scrutiny offered “The UK's most complete broadband package” which was said to be “free for six months” to new customers. The advert continued its headlining message; “Then just £13 a month, plus your line rental at £14.60 a month.” However small print on the advert read as follows; “Offer ends 10/01/13. For new BT broadband customers only that sign up for an 18 month minimum term and pay BT line rental of £14.60 a month (rising to £15.45 on 05/01/13).”

BT’s TV advert was also found to be misleading, promoting the broadband package as costing “just £13 a month plus £14.60 for a BT line. And now free for six months.” Many people assumed the line rental was part of the “free” aspect when it was not.

Complaints to the ASA were as follows;

  1. One complainant, who understood that line rental was payable during the first six months, challenged whether the claim "Free for six months" in ad (a) was misleading.
  2. One complainant, who understood that line rental was payable during the first six months, challenged whether the claim "free for six months" in ad (b) was misleading.
  3. One complainant, who understood that the line rental would increase to £15.45 in January 2013, challenged whether the claim "£14.60 for a BT line" in ad (b) was misleading.

Complaints number 1 and 2 were upheld by the ASA. Complaint 3 was rejected “because the date and amount of the price increase was made clear in the on-screen text”.

BT’s response

BT admitted that its adverts could have been clearer. The company “believed the ambiguity was an unintended consequence of their attempts to comply with a recent ASA adjudication, relating to another telecoms provider, regarding the prominence of line rental”. This ruling asks ISPs to state costs of line rental clearly alongside broadband prices.

What’s going to happen to BT?

Not very much is the answer. The ASA has ruled that both the print and TV ads under scrutiny “must not appear again in their current form.” Also the regulator wrote in its report that BT must make clear “the extent of the commitment consumers must make to take advantage of “free” offers in future.”

How BT used to make ads in the 1980s

HEXUS Forums :: 9 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
The Bt line rental is the reason I went for an all inclusive package.
They should be ashamed for charging so much for the most miserable internet connection possible.
The 14.60 line rental is basically what the government tells bt to charge for maintaining and improving the countries connection.

So to all those on infinity, enjoy. I helped get that to you. Now BT… when can i get more than 2mbs?
Thankfully you can find cheaper line rental. I recently switched to the phone Coop, which is £11 per month on paperless billing. It's also only a 30 day contract minimum.
It never fails to astound me how toothless the ASA is. So those ads must not appear again in their current form. Just how likely is it that BT would want to run the ads again when “Offer ends 10/01/13”….
They'll be sure not to mess with the ASA again!