facebook rss twitter

Berners-Lee attacks Facebook's 'walled off' approach

by Sarah Griffiths on 23 November 2010, 10:58

Tags: General Business

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qa27z

Add to My Vault: x

Open standards and smartphone apps

Berners-Lee also drew attention to companies that choose to eschew open standards to create ‘closed worlds' such as Apple's iTunes system that identities songs using open URIs but has a proprietary address to limit access.

"You can't make a link to any information in the iTunes world-a song or information about a band. You can't send that link to someone else to see. You are no longer on the Web. The iTunes world is centralized and walled off. You are trapped in a single store, rather than being on the open marketplace. For all the store's wonderful features, its evolution is limited to what one company thinks up," he said.

He also widened his attack to the media, which is feverishly producing smartphone apps for magazines and shunning web app functionality, which Berners-Lee described as ‘disturbing' as the material is ‘off the web'.

"You can't bookmark it or e-mail a link to a page within it. You can't tweet it. It is better to build a Web app that will also run on smartphone browsers, and the techniques for doing so are getting better all the time," he added.

Berners-Lee warned: "Some people may think that closed worlds are just fine. The worlds are easy to use and may seem to give those people what they want. But as we saw in the 1990s with the America Online dial-up information system that gave you a restricted subset of the Web, these closed, "walled gardens," no matter how pleasing, can never compete in diversity, richness and innovation with the mad, throbbing Web market outside their gates."

"If a walled garden has too tight a hold on a market, however, it can delay that outside growth," he added.



HEXUS Forums :: 3 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
While I agree with him, this is what business always do - attempt to take over, control users/money and try and monopolise (and this can be non-deliberate). You just need to look at all other major technologies - cars, telephones, electricity etc - They all started with small companies that in general didn't work together and slowly the smaller companies get swallowed up until you just have three or four companies that control 99% of market. I'm afriad I can see the same thing happen with the internet. I mean think about it - how much of your internet time is spent on a Facebook, Google, Microsoft or Apple free website?
The only time I spend on Microsoft website is when I'm either using bing search (fairly infrequent) or when I've developing on their platform.

Again google, thanks to how good the search results are I spend less than 5-10% of my time on it. The rest are mostly indies.
Deleted
…, this is what business always do - attempt to take over, control users/money and try and monopolise (and this can be non-deliberate).

Monopolies are a direct result of the capitalist system. Maximise profit = monopoly. Whether they realise that is the case or not is irrelevant, they are striving for it, along with everyone else, because of the profit dynamic which is ingrained into our society.



With regards to the internet I agree with Berners-Lee, creating “silos” will only fragment the internet but I don't share his view that it will have a negative impact on the internet. The internet will be fine, people will choose where they go and more than likely adapt their browsing habits according to their interpretation of the web.

What I am more concerned with is government meddling with the internet under the guise of security. That is a massive threat to the internet which is the last remaining place people are left to think for themselves. The government can create there own little silos and cordon themselves off but extending that will be the beginning of the end.

“My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government.”
Thomas Jefferson