facebook rss twitter

Legislation seeks to nix Internet censorship

by Sylvie Barak on 23 November 2009, 09:25

Tags: Yahoo! (NASDAQ:YHOO), Google (NASDAQ:GOOG)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qauzo

Add to My Vault: x

Excuses, excuses

Bob Boorstin, Google's director of corporate and policy communications has said the GOFA legislation could be "improved to avoid impeding the spread of technologies around the world that promote free expression." In other words, don't let free speech get in the way of our ad sales in China.

Boorstin reckons issues of censorship and free expression are best left to "international human rights accords and trade mechanisms," which certainly seem to have done a simply spiffing job so far. Not.

In 2007, Yahoo was lambasted by human rights activists for handing over personal information belonging to Chinese pro-democracy activists to local authorities.

In a statement, Yahoo said that, "While the goals set forth by the sponsors of GOFA are noble, the bill's scope could ultimately mean that companies will have to cease providing information services in a number of countries." The statement went on to say that Yahoo would "continue working with Congress as it addresses this legislation."

To fend off the bill Yahoo, Google, Microsoft have now formed the Global Network Initiative which the trio say is dedicated to protecting "freedom of expression" in information technology.

Although obviously not at the sacrifice of profits.



HEXUS Forums :: 5 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Not convinced that this is the right way to go, it seems a bit like imposing your laws in other countries - something that's never sat right with me.
Actually they should do it. Like so many past US foreign policy “initiatives” it'll come back and bite them in the derriere one way or another. Some idiots never learn. :wallbash:
Hmmm not sure leglisation that demands companies ignore legislation in another country that they operate in is such a good idea.

Clearly the issue of net censorship needs solving, but I don't see how this will help.
My immediate gut reaction ….. the legislation is a good idea, though I see why Google etc wouldn't like it.
Although I agree with the legislation it does seem a bit American Crusade! Saving the world and getting the girl!

Perhaps the legislation should stop American companies handing over information to authoritarian regimes, I remember a case a while back where Google handed information over to Chinese authorities about political activists.