facebook rss twitter

Google's Wave to splash down on testers

by Sylvie Barak on 30 September 2009, 10:32

Tags: Google (NASDAQ:GOOG)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qauaj

Add to My Vault: x

Fishing for profits

Unlike Gmail, however, Google is really pushing for this project to crack the enterprise space, with the firm believing Wave will finally allow it to seep into the more lucrative world of corporate clientele.  

Another Google blog, by Wave Product Manager Stephanie Hannon, also mentioned that the Internet giant may try to cash-in on the service via a ""monetizable wave extension store" - basically an app store which would let developers sell add-ons to the software.

Hannon explained that firms like SAP and Salesforce were already working on "software prototypes" to add on to Wave, including applications such video conferencing, trip-planning and games.

Rasmussen further writes there are also still "key features of Google Wave that we have yet to fully implement." For example, Rasmussen explains one can't yet remove a participant from a wave or define groups of users. Likewise, "draft mode is still missing and you can't configure the permissions of users on a wave."

Stormy seas ahead

Meanwhile, it would appear the whole Wave scenario could get a little choppy, with a storm brewing between Google and Microsoft. For Google to reach as wide an audience as possible, an Internet Explorer (IE) plug-in would be key, as Microsoft currently holds about 75 per cent of the browser market. 

Getting around this, Google rather sneakily unveiled its "Chrome Frame" plugin last week, enabling Chrome to run inside IE itself. Both Microsoft and Mozilla have launched scathing attacks on the move, with Microsoft even going as far as calling it a "security risk"

Google hasn't yet given any firm indication about when Wave is likely to inundate the general public, but the official Wave Web site promises the service should wash up on a cyber beach near you "later this year".

Find out more by watching this Google-produced video.

 

 



HEXUS Forums :: 1 Comment

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Whilst Wave is exciting, it isn't just MS who are calling the Chrome Frame into question on security grounds - Mozilla are too:
Mozilla's Mike Shaver avoids the scare tactics, arguing that Chrome Frame will not only sidestep security tools built into Internet Explorer, but also muddle the way users think about security. “As a side-effect, the user’s understanding of the web’s security model and the behaviour of their browser is seriously hindered by delegating the choice of software to the developers of individual sites they visit,” he says.

“It is a problem that we have seen repeatedly with other stack-plugins like Flash, Silverlight and Java, and not one that I think we need to see replayed again under the banner of HTML5.”

Mitchell Baker sees such confusion spreading even further. “If you end up at a website that makes use of the Chrome Frame, the treatment of your passwords, security settings, personalization all the other things one sets in a browser is suddenly unknown,” she says. “Will sites you tag or bookmark while browsing with one rendering engine show up in the other? Because the various parts of the browser are no longer connected, actions that have one result in the browser you think you’re using won’t have the same result in the Chrome browser-within-a-browser.”

Then she envisions a world where others follow the Google lead. “Imagine having the Google browser-within-a-browser for some sites, the Facebook browser-within-a-browser for Facebook Connect sites, the Apple variant for iTunes, the mobile-carrier variant for your mobile sites - all injected into a single piece of software the user thinks of as his or her ‘browser,’” she continues.

“The result is a sort of browser-soup, where a given user action serves up some sort of response, but it’s not clear what the result will be… This makes the web less knowable, less understandable, and certainly less manageable.”

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/09/29/mozilla_on_chrome_frame/

You can argue that there are FF add-ons (like IETab) that provide “browser-within-a-browser” functionality, but that's explicitly declared by them. This “plug-in” doesn't do that, and I think that's wrong.