facebook rss twitter

20% of Brits would pay for digital content

by Scott Bicheno on 14 December 2009, 16:28

Tags: GfK, News Corp (NASDAQ:NWS)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qavdq

Add to My Vault: x

Paying the piper

Regular readers will be well aware of media mogul Rupert Murdoch's crusade to find new revenue streams for News Corp's content in an era when consumers expect it for free and advertisers are keeping their wallets shut.

He wants to get end-users to pay for news in the same way they (sometimes) pay for other media, like music. So it must have been with some trepidation that News Corp-owned Wall Street Journal Europe commissioned market researcher GfK to survey 16 European countries and the USA to find out how willing people were to shell-out for digital content.

Unsurprisingly, only 13 percent of the total survey said they would be prepared to pay for online information. However, it looks like us Brits are a bit more receptive to the idea, with almost 20 percent of us (and 17 percent of Americans) willing to pay for digital content.

On the negative side, a third of all survey participants reckoned online content should not only be free, but that there shouldn't even be ads!

When asked what they use the Internet for, email came top, closely followed by searching for information. Reading the news came third, while social networking came fourth, with around a quarter of all those surveyed participation.  

Here's a table.

 



HEXUS Forums :: 10 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
its still 20% more than they are getting at the moment.

I still adverts are the best way to fund this kind of thing though.
Jay
its still 20% more than they are getting at the moment.

I still adverts are the best way to fund this kind of thing though.

Yeah, agreed. Ignoring the figures for a minute - i'd say that 80%+ of the UK population would be perfectly happy with advert laced music / video on demand - think cheap sky but with all content at the touch of the remote (supersky+)

BUT - give people a choice. I'll happily hand over £75 or so a month for all you can eat audio (lossless, no DRM) and proper bluray spec video (20-25 gig per movie, no DRM either). There's a lot of people like me with a lot of money rattling around their pockets at the moment waiting for a service that isn't constrained to particular devices/locations/content. Give us what we want!
Where is this 20% figure coming from, Hexus? Looks like 18% to me.
i would happily hand over small amounts of money when i am bored to watch movies… Infact i already do this when i am feeling lazy with zune market place on my xbox although the cost is high for what you get with the rental I pay it because i am lazy and can do it conveniently.

If i could pay £75 a month for all the content i would ever need (music/video) as previously posted i would pay it and definatlty use it! I would prefer this over illegal methods of getting content but it would have to be easy to use and be unlocked so i can use it on what ever device i wanted.
kalniel
Where is this 20% figure coming from, Hexus? Looks like 18% to me.

Technically 18% and 20% are the same thing to 1s.f. though this kind of thing always makes it look like someone is trying to skew numbers.