facebook rss twitter

EU commissioner gunning for MS Office

by Hugh Bicheno on 10 June 2008, 13:22

Tags: Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qannh

Add to My Vault: x

MS standards not acceptable

EU Competition Commissioner Neelie Kroes upped the ante in her battle against Microsoft (MS) in a speech in which she strongly recommended that European governments and businesses should use software based on open standards.

The Kroesade (sorry, can’t resist a bad pun) against MS over the past four years for violating European competition rules and for defying the judgements of the European Commission (EC) has left the company with a tab for €1.676 billion ($2.60bn), and counting.

Assuming the company is discounting and has calculated that lawyers’ fees are substantially less than the sum in question will earn in MS’s hands, there may well be no time limit on how long the company continues to defy the EC. Hence, possibly, Kroes’s renewed assault.

MS is already the target of two more antitrust investigations, and has recently announced that the Office 2007 suite, currently using MS’s version (OOXML) of Extensible Markup Language, will support Open Document Format (ODF) in Office 2007 Service Pack 2 in the first half of 2009.

The concession has not assuaged Kroes’s anger. She said a single, dominant software supplier posed serious security concerns for governments and businesses. “I know a smart business decision when I see one,” she added. “Choosing open standards is a very smart business decision indeed.”

Other standards cases investigated by the commission include the operations of mobile phone company Qualcomm over licensing terms and chip technology group Rambus over the use of the use of certain patents for DRAM chips, but there was no question who Kroes was talking about.

Summing it up, Kroes said when the market leads to a particular proprietary technology becoming the de facto standard, and the technology owner exploits that power, then “the competition authority has to recreate the conditions of competition that would have emerged from a properly carried out standardisation process.”



HEXUS Forums :: 3 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Remember these are the same people who believe their own hype about Videogame nasties.

I have been an IT and infrastructure engineer for over 20 years, and although open standards has its merits (it’s virtually free) it is the most unsafe software available.

Don’t believe all these idiots who try to prove how bad MS software is because it is always getting hacked.

It is always getting hacked because the hackers are all from the, I want something for nothing brigade who's only aim in life is to destroy Microsoft.

Open source software is only safe because nobody at the moment is out to prove a point with it.

But by it sheer nature open source is a security accident waiting to happen, how can something that has its underlying code available anywhere you look be safe?

It can't, so for once in its pitiful existence Europe should stop its crusade against anything American and get real.
One of the biggest bug bears of mine is that open source is somehow safer because its source code is available to be viewed by others.

The strange thing is, i know NOT ONE low level developer who thinks this way.

There are many who say its piss easy to see an un-checked buffer overflow, but guess what the compilers warn for this, and its also easy to detect in compiled code. A lot of the more modern bugs are very complex, requireing a large number of often seamingly disconnected events to happen.

But on topic, standardising office formats is all well and good, as long as it dosen't standardise the feature set, innovation should still be the big driving factor.
note: openoffice does not have a 100% compliant ODF implementation