facebook rss twitter

HEXUS.sharewatch: Apple breaks the $200 billion barrier

by Scott Bicheno on 15 March 2010, 12:18

Tags: Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qawlu

Add to My Vault: x

It looks like it's not just Apple fanboys who get caught-up in the hype machine. Over the past year Apple's shares have more than doubled, and last week its market capitalisation - the cost of buying all its shares - topped the $200 billion mark and overtook grocery giant Wal-Mart in the process.

In principle, investors aren't star-struck consumers, easily hypnotised by the latest Apple shiny thing and Steve Jobs' accompanying superlatives. They're pragmatic, savvy assessors of the future growth and profitability potential of a company, who make bets accordingly.

But you have to wonder whether Apple is an exception here, as it is in so many other contexts. Last year's growth is mainly attributable to the momentum behind the iPhone. This is significant not just for the money Apple makes from each one sold, but for the mobile Internet install-base it gives Apple, which is uniquely proficient at extracting extra revenue from its customers.

The market is betting that things like the app store will be long-term cash-cows for Apple and that rival platforms like Android, BlackBerry and Windows Phone won't eat into its share too much. The iPhone remains the standard by which smartphones are judged, but there are a lot of big companies chucking a lot of money at that market, so it won't be easy for Apple to stay on top.

To put this valuation into context, look at the market cap column below. For the price of Apple you could buy the world's biggest PC marker - HP - the biggest phone maker - Nokia - and still have enough left to buy Dell too.

Company Listing Share price 21/2/10 Share price 28/2/10 Share price 8/3/10 Share price 15/3/10 7-day change Market cap (bn)
AMD AMD 7.93 7.91 8.61 8.93 3.7% 6.00
Apple AAPL 201.67 204.62 218.95 226.70 3.5% 205.57
ARM ARMH 9.38 9.29 10.56 10.43 -1.2% 4.56
Avnet AVT 28.19 27.61 28.05 28.79 2.6% 4.37
Cisco CSCO 24.36 24.33 25.21 25.88 2.7% 148.18
Dell DELL 13.47 13.23 13.89 14.26 2.7% 27.90
Google GOOG 540.48 526.80 564.21 579.54 2.7% 184.28
HP HPQ 50.79 50.79 52.03 52.36 0.6% 123.26
IBM IBM 127.19 127.16 127.25 127.94 0.5% 166.19
Ingram Micro IM 18.01 17.70 17.82 18.01 1.1% 2.97
Intel INTC 20.81 20.53 20.79 21.27 2.3% 117.50
Microsoft MSFT 28.78 28.67 28.59 29.24 2.3% 256.45
Nokia NOK 13.37 13.47 14.13 14.84 5.0% 55.03
Nvidia NVDA 16.58 16.20 17.16 17.25 0.5% 9.57
Oracle ORCL 24.32 24.65 24.95 25.05 0.4% 125.53
Qualcomm QCOM 39.59 36.69 38.76 38.95 0.5% 65.46
Tech Data TECD 43.16 42.84 41.97 43.26 3.1% 2.20
Dow .DJI 10402.35 10325.26 10566.20 10624.69 0.6% N/A
FTSE 100 .FTSE 5358.17 5354.52 5599.76 5625.65 0.5% N/A
NASDAQ .IXIC 2243.87 2238.26 2326.35 2367.66 1.8% N/A


HEXUS Forums :: 6 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Running with the heard!

The thing is every time I want to say they are over priced, they have something like 25k useless iPads sold in an hour, despite the fact no one knows what they can do, but plenty of people put the BOM well below the half the retail price.

Amazing.
TheAnimus
Running with the heard!

The thing is every time I want to say they are over priced, they have something like 25k useless iPads sold in an hour, despite the fact no one knows what they can do, but plenty of people put the BOM well below the half the retail price.

Amazing.
I bet the A4 chip helped reduce the BOM, although I wonder how many units they'll need to shift to offset that against the cost of acquiring the semi company and developing it… probably 5, maybe 6 iPads.
Steve
t the cost of acquiring the semi company and developing it… probably 5, maybe 6 iPads.
Erm, you mean 5-6 million iPads ?

I find it amazing Apple are valued so highly (even I do actually own plenty of their products),
there are far fewer apple devices I see around than HP or dells.
mikerr
Erm, you mean 5-6 million iPads ?

I find it amazing Apple are valued so highly (even I do actually own plenty of their products),
there are far fewer apple devices I see around than HP or dells.

I think it was /sarc due to the extortionate price they charge per 'Pad, thus only needing to sell 5 or 6.
Terbinator
I think it was /sarc due to the extortionate price they charge per 'Pad, thus only needing to sell 5 or 6.
It's not like they spent a lot on PA Semi either, about $280million apparently. I would say that makes it about 7-8 iPads though :P