facebook rss twitter

Review: ADATA XPG SX300 128GB mSATA SSD

by Tarinder Sandhu on 8 August 2012, 09:17 3.0

Tags: Adata (3260.TWO)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qabkjj

Add to My Vault: x

Final thoughts and rating


ADATA is a company that may not be overly-familiar to you yet it's large enough to manufacture SSDs for a number of high-profile customers in our comparison line-up. Looking to offer more than just a garden-variety 2.5in SSD, which everyone can do, ADATA pads out its catalogue with a range of mSATA drives

Pushing the mSATA performance envelope is the SX300 128GB, which is a premium SandForce SF-2281 drive neatly packaged to fit into a smaller form factor. Its vital statistics - 500MB/s sequential read and write - make for enviable reading, but the SX300's potential is stifled on today's desktop motherboards, where the SATA 3Gbps mSATA interface limits bandwidth.

ADATA really needs motherboard manufacturers to adopt SATA 6Gbps-interfacing mSATA ports before the SX300's performance promise is realised on the desktop. As it stands, the SX300 only makes sense as an upgrade solution for the notebook market, where the 6Gbps mSATA interface is fast becoming the norm.

The Good

Has incredible potential for an mSATA product
Could be a good upgrade for a laptop
Super-easy setup and usage

The Bad

Doesn't make a lot of sense in a desktop environment
Twice the price of an equivalent 2.5in SSD

HEXUS Rating

3/5
ADATA XPG SX300 mSATA 128GB

HEXUS Where2Buy

TBC.

HEXUS Right2Reply

At HEXUS, we invite the companies whose products we test to comment on our articles. If any company representatives for the products reviewed choose to respond, we'll publish their commentary here verbatim.



HEXUS Forums :: 3 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Possibly stupid question - the Z77 boards also support intel quick resume (or whatever it is called) which requires a RAM-sized partition on an SSD if memory serves. Could that be used with a SSD such as this, in conjunction with the Z77-caching feature? 64Gb for cache, 16Gb for ram-resume and the rest as “spare” for nand redundancy?

I could imagine a scenario where a SATA6G SSD is used as OS drive with a large data/games drive. The mSATA drive could cache the latter, and provide quick resume functionality without taking space away from the OS SSD.

Is that even a possible scenario?
Any clue on availability? I'd be after the 256Gb version as/when it becomes available in the UK…

Did you not have an ultrabook that you could use to benchmark this (at the SATA III rather than II)? It feels a bit unfair to be comparing II vs III.

… or perhaps a comparison to another mSATA drive? like the M4 from Crucial?
… hows about picking up one of these mSATA to SATA adaptors and re-running the benchmarks?