facebook rss twitter

Review: TeamGroup T-Force Cardea Zero Z440 NVMe SSD (1TB)

by Tarinder Sandhu on 21 August 2020, 14:01

Tags: Team Group

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaenc3

Add to My Vault: x

Conclusion

.. Focussing on larger 1TB and 2TB capacities, entry into this realm of fast, spacious storage begins at £200.

A few storage vendors have been eager to jump on the PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 bandwagon that's a perfect fit for a performance AMD build in 2020. The likes of Corsair, Aorus, Sabrent, ADATA, and TeamGroup use the Phison E16 controller allied to, usually, 96-layer NAND from Kioxia

TeamGroup's T-Force Cardea Zero Z440 is no different in this regard. Focussing on larger 1TB and 2TB capacities, entry into this realm of fast, spacious storage begins at £200. That outlay brings with it a drive that's great in sequential transfers and solid elsewhere, and there's little debate that going down this hardware route offers top-notch performance.

Yet compared to other PCIe 4.0 x4 drives using ostensibly the same hardware, the Cardea Zero Z440 is a bit slower in the intensive SPEC test, has perfunctory application support, comes in at a higher price than, say, the Sabrent or Corsair, and is available in fewer online stores. It's not a bad drive per se, yet it fails the match the overall proposition from its immediate competitors.

Bottom line: a fast 1TB drive built on proven Phison E16 and Kioxia technology, it needs to be closer to £150 for it to stand out amongst similar drives that offer that bit extra.

The Good
 
The Bad
Great sequential numbers
Five-year warranty
 
Basic application support
Feels expensive
Not available in many stores

HEXUS.where2buy*

TBC.

HEXUS.right2reply

At HEXUS, we invite the companies whose products we test to comment on our articles. If any company representatives for the products reviewed choose to respond, we'll publish their commentary here verbatim.



HEXUS Forums :: 4 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Looking through all this, the buy would fall on kingston.
QuorTek
Looking through all this, the buy would fall on kingston.

It does show that PCIe4 is not as important as latency and IOPs from the controller and the sort of flash used. But it is all down to intended usage and cost.

Some of these drives are double the cost per GB of the slower drives, and for example the game loading speed you are going to notice double the space more than extra performance that an average home user won't really feel.
This kinda feels like extra fast or extra tight timed RAM; you pay a premium for results you'd struggle to feel outside of benchmarking. Would much rather use the 70 quid difference in price from a PCIe3 drive and put that money somewhere useful.
So i drive that will cost an arm, will perform only in benchmark, but in real world copy paste etc scenario performs abysmal… China?