facebook rss twitter

Review: Windows 8 - Part One: Rebirth

by Parm Mann on 29 October 2012, 12:00

Tags: Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT), Windows 8

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qabogj

Add to My Vault: x

Ambition

There's a lot to get through in this particular review - two unique operating systems, you might say - but before we dig in to the Modern UI, the apps, the desktop and more, it's worth reiterating that Windows 8 is arguably Microsoft's most ambitious release to date.

Sporting a Modern UI (formerly codenamed Metro), this is the new face of Microsoft as a company. The same design philosophy already exists on Windows smartphones and the company's own Xbox 360 games console, but in extending the Modern UI to Windows, Microsoft is bringing its reimagined and reinvented interface to not tens of millions of customers, but hundreds of millions.

In the Microsoft ecosystem, TVs, desktops, laptops, tablets and smartphones are all destined to carry this new look. But it's more than that, for users of any previous Windows operating system, Windows 8 doesn't just look different, it performs differently, too. It requires new ways of thinking, it's designed to work with forward-looking devices, and it functions best when connected to the cloud. It's a huge gamble as these changes represent a steep learning curve, but there's no turning back; this is the future of Microsoft, for better or for worse.

In the next part of our review, we'll be examining the pros and cons of the Modern UI.



HEXUS Forums :: 15 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Look forward to reading the second part and that might make me decide if its worth bothering with on a gaming desktop.

Keep it up Hexus :)
Very interesting, also looking forwards to part 2. I've generally been of the opinion that there is no point upgrading my PC as I don't have a touch screen, but I would like to know what the experience is like without one :)
I like Windows 7 on my main pc. Touch is a complete waste of time on that machine because my arms are not long enough to touch the screen! If it works sensibly without touch I may give it a go on my main machine.

I will be installing it on my HTPC though. Tiles make more sense on a screen 8 ft away then a standard desktop. The fact the WMC has not been upgraded, there is no Blu-ray support does rather worsen the idea. When XBMC get proper native blu - ray support and the TV back end becomes mature, W8 goes on the HTPC as well
The Modern UI adorning the Windows 8 Start screen is so different that many users will initially feel lost, and a thorough demonstration - or better still, a video detailing the new interface - should be here to help newcomers get accustomed to navigating Windows 8.
I really hope that the comment above gets back to someone in the Windows development team at Microsoft. That was the experience of one of my relatives who got “dropped in the deep end” (his words) of Windows 8 this weekend, having been a happy Windows 7 user previously. More information for folks transitioning (especially if the upgrade packs are going to be popular this Christmas) would be highly desirable.

I might have a Windows 7 -> 8 migration to do at Christmas, so I'm hoping that the User Migration Assistant that I used to go from XP to 7 is still available for the 7 to 8 jump. That really did make the process of moving a user from older OS to a new one a no-brainer. :)

Can't help thinking though, that if touch is such a big part of the whole Windows8/MUI “experience” then there's surely scope for the manufacturers of touch screen monitors to do some kind of discount deal on the Windows8 software upgrade with their products to drive demand.
I'll echo the statements of the folks above - good article and I look forward to part 2. :hexlub:
My wife who uses a computer all day as part of her job (Customer Services using a PC as a data entry/query tool in the local council) has given Windows 8 the thumbs down. She said it would make her job harder and be more complicated and time consuming to use.

She also pointed out that because of the nature of her job she has to have several programs running AND on screen at the same time and be able to cut and past between them very quickly. She said the ‘App’ environment would be useless to her and all the others at work.

Bearing in mind that it takes her system 20 minutes to boot, login (separately) to about a dozen bespoke packages and be ready to start working her IT department wouldn't have a clue how to get Windows 8 up and running in any sort of useful manner. As they insist that the whole council all use one OS hten they will be sticking with Windows 7 for a very long time! (They only upgraded from XP to Windows 7 a couple of months ago after lots of problems!).

She said Windows 8 looks OK for on a tablet or phone but looks stupid on a desktop PC, especially as there are hardly any touch enabled ones around and no one has the money to waste on new monitors just for a gimmick. Her view was that Microsoft should have released 2 products “Windows 8 Touch” and “Windows 8 Desktop” and each of those should have come in 2 ‘flavours’… “Standard” and “Pro”. Windows 8 Touch should also come with both x86 and ARM on the same disc so you could just choose which to install.

The economic climate is all wrong for launching such a major change of paradigm.

We won't be getting Windows 8 and will wait to see what Windows 9 is like… hopefully more like what she suggested:

Windows 9 Touch (x86/ARM on single disk)
Standard
Pro
Windows 9 Desktop (x32/x64 on single disk)
Standard
Pro

Thus you go into a shop/online and choose Tablet or PC, then Upgrade or Retail, then Standard or Pro. Simple clear steps, well priced.