facebook rss twitter

Review: MSI K9N SLI Platinum - nForce 570 SLI

by Steve Kerrison on 4 July 2006, 09:21

Tags: Fatal1ty nForce 570 SLI, MSI K9N SLI Platinum

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaf5z

Add to My Vault: x

Thoughts, HEXUS.awards & HEXUS.right2reply

The MSI K9N SLI Platinum took our usual barrage of tests without any trouble, so it shouldn't prove too much trouble for anyone familiar with PC installations to get this board up and running. There are still a few software issues, however, such as NTune not fully functioning, and the latest 90-series ForceWare drivers causing issues in SLI, but time is a great healer of such issues, providing NVIDIA and MSI play the game.

We feel that a bit more thought (and money) could be spent on the chipset and VRM cooling for this board. It doesn't need to cost a fortune or make a complete racket, but we'd be happier if the heatsinks weren't quite as hot to the touch.

Performance at the stock speeds used in our tests show that this board is just as happy grinding away at the latest games with high-end hardware sat in it, despite the 'one-down-from-the-top' nForce 570 SLI chipset. It came out slowest in most tests, but by a margin hardly worth mentioning.

It's when you look at the board from the point of view of an enthusiast that it starts to lose some of its appeal. Some tweaking can be done in the BIOS, but it's not enough to lure in the hard overclocker.

Price-wise, at the time of writing this board sits just below Ā£95 including VAT, at a popular UK retailer. That puts it somewhere in the middle of the nForce 570 SLI offerings, and, of course, below the nForce 590 SLI boards. The bundle's adequate, but there's nothing in there to push the cost up much. It's a fitting price, then.

The bottom line? MSI's K9N SLI Platinum and the nForce 570 SLI live up to their 'performance gaming' moniker. If you like your hardware shiny and new (that's AM2), but you're not up for much extreme tweaking and overclocking, then MSI's K9N SLI Platinum will have all the features you need to be a happy little game-player.

HEXUS Awards

In light of the MSI K9N SLI Platinum's ability to perform almost identically with its nForce 570 SLI, compared with nForce 590 SLI solutions, we have decided to give it the HEXUS.award for gaming speed.

HEXUS Awards - Gaming Speed



HEXUS Forums :: 3 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Good read but a shame that there was no real overclocking.
Anandtech have had 2 different 570 boards top out ~ 316-318 & hypothesised that they are being limited somehow so as not to reach the same levels as 590s.
Will be interesting to see if that proves to be the case.
I hear you with respect to overclocking. We'll see what we can do about that for future reviews, especially those involving 570 SLI chipsets.
“We feel that a bit more thought (and money) could be spent on the chipset and VRM cooling for this board. It doesn't need to cost a fortune or make a complete racket, but we'd be happier if the heatsinks weren't quite as hot to the touch.”

Firat of all, I don't envy your job in testing Motherboards. All you can really test is some performance things that are very undifferentiated across similar types of board, look at the BIOS to see what goodies there are on offer, and make some comments about the board layout and the bundle. Usually you are on an early release of the BIOS code so have little idea of what its real quality will be when generally available, etc.

This means you don't get to test what I find is one of the most important aspects of a MOBO - how reliable is it going to be? What is it going to be like after a year of having dust sucked across it? Do the ethernet ports pack up and die after a month? etc etc.

Chipset cooling is one of those things that are hard to judge. What gives better reliability - passive or fan cooling? The passively cooled ones like this one do tend to get very hot, but does this impact reliability worse than having a very small heatsink with a fan? In my experience with fans, the little suckers run a horribly high speeds and are prone to failure. Maybe you are better off with a setup like this that hits 90 degrees normally, as opposed to a setup that runs at 80 degrees when the fan is working but hits 100+ degrees when the fan fails or goes slow….. Personally I'd take the passive option for preference.

–miw