facebook rss twitter

Review: GeCube Radeon X1650 XT Dual 512MB

by Tarinder Sandhu on 12 July 2007, 11:24

Tags: Gecube

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qajbh

Add to My Vault: x

Final thoughts, HEXUS awards, HEXUS.where2buy, HEXUS.right2reply, further reading



Let's play good cop, bad cop.

We're fans of innovation and congratulate GeCube on designing a working dual-GPU card featuring twin Radeon X1650 XTs on one PCB. Performance is reasonable for the expected £120 outlay and quad-monitor support is handy for a niche market.

But bad cop has a bigger list. The Radeon X1650 XT GPU was reasonable for its time. Now, however, AMD's Radeon HD 2000 series and NVIDIA's GeForce 8500/8600 offer DX10-supporting tech that's coupled with impressive high-def video-decode performance. They may not be quite as fast in pure pixel-pushing grunt but we'd love to see GeCube (really) quickly release its multi-GPU Radeon HD2600-based card instead.

By the very nature of the Radeon X1650 XT GPU, GeCube misses out on dual-link DVI and, as far as we can discern, HDCP support on our sample.

Further, a dual-GPU design works well when multi-GPU support is efficiently implemented and that may not always be the case. Add in our sample's noisy cooler and, really, we'd advise you to either go for the cheapest - currently around £90 - Radeon X1950 Pro you can find or, if you really want innovation in your box, wait until GeCube launches the RV630 dual-GPU model.

The premise here was good. Late time to market, a comparative lack of features, and reliance on CrossFire relegates the GeCube X1650 XT Dual 512MiB to being just an interesting product: there are better buys out there right now.

HEXUS.certification

Gaming Labs
GeCube X1650 XT Dual 512MiB


HEXUS Where2Buy

TBC

HEXUS.right2repy

At HEXUS.net, we invite the companies whose products we test to comment on our articles. If any of GeCube's representatives choose to respond, we'll publish their commentary here verbatim.

HEXUS related reading

HEXUS.net - graphics cards - all reviews and news

HEXUS.net - reviews :: Sapphire X1950 Pro Dual 1GiB
HEXUS.net - reviews :: AMD Radeon HD 2600 XT and Radeon HD 2400 XT - saviours or sinners
HEXUS.net - reviews :: ASUS EAX1650XT 256MiB (X1650 XT single card and CrossFire)
HEXUS.net - reviews :: XFX GeForce 8600 GT XXX Edition - hardcore or not?
HEXUS.net - reviews :: ECS N8600GTS-256MX+
HEXUS.net - reviews :: MSI GeForce 8600GTS - the new mid-range champion?
HEXUS.net - reviews :: Inno3D iChiLL 7900GS Arctic Cooling Silencer 6
HEXUS.net - reviews :: ASUS EAX1950PRO HDTP/256M - the best yet?


HEXUS Forums :: 4 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
This may be a very stupid question but, is it remotely possible to put two GPU cores on one die, sort of like dual-core GPU? I mean, aren't GPUs already as complex as CPU's? I apologize of this may seem a very stupid question to some people. :tomato:
Quantum-M
This may be a very stupid question but, is it remotely possible to put two GPU cores on one die, sort of like dual-core GPU? I mean, aren't GPUs already as complex as CPU's? I apologize of this may seem a very stupid question to some people. :tomato:

Very far from being a stupid question - and it's what NVIDIA and AMD are planning.

AMD's strategy will be to have silicon that can the GPU and CPU on a single bit of silicon, some with multiple GPUs others with multiple CPUs - mix and match to suit the application.

A bit like this, in fact:



Here's a bigger version.

Bob

Here's some background reading.

And some more.
Minor correction on pg2:

“Stripping it down, you see the two RV530 cores are apportioned their own 256MiB framebuffer, making 512MiB in total.”

X1650 XT = RV560

Also here on pg5:
“Strapping a couple of RV530s provides decent framerates in Far Cry”
Well spootted, that man :)