facebook rss twitter

Review: XFX Radeon HD 4850 XXX 512MB. £125 worth of value?

by Tarinder Sandhu on 13 March 2009, 09:22 3.95

Tags: Radeon HD 4850 512MB XXX Edition, XFX (HKG:1079), PC

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qarfk

Add to My Vault: x

Final thoughts and rating

XFX's Radeon HD 4850 XXX 512MB graphics card builds on the solid foundations of the reference design, but improves upon it with a better-performing cooler and a slight boost to each of the three core frequencies - core, shader, and memory.

The result is that performance is between three and five per cent higher than a vanilla card, evaluated at the 1,920x1,200 resolution, and the card can play most games with relative ease. Price, too, is attractive, coming in at around £10 more than ye olde reference.

Competition from the green team is fierce, with the XFX card duking it out against a GeForce 9800 GTX+ and GeForce GTS 250 - and it's now difficult to buy a stinker of a GPU between £100-£150.

Bringing price into the equation and you could argue that it's well worth spending the extra £20 for a Radeon HD 4870 512MB card or £40 for a reduced-priced GeForce GTX 260, but we feel that XFX has enough going for the XXX Edition to warrant consideration no matter how strong the competition.

Better-than-reference cooling and factory-based overclocking are worth the £10 outlay over a basic card, and that's why we're inclined to recommend the XFX's Radeon HD 4850 XXX 512MB for gamers whose budget doesn't extend far north of £100.

Pros

Much better cooling than on the reference card
Attractive etail price of £125
Pre-overclocked out of the box
Should provide excellent gaming with 1,680x1,050 TFT panels
Great overclocking headroom on sample card

Cons

Double-height cooler may cause some issues if folks want to position it in a SFF box
GeForce 9800 GTX+ (GTS 250) may be an older architecture but still provides serious competition, especially with recent price cuts

HEXUS Rating

HEXUS.net scores products out of 100%, taking into account technology, implementation, stability, performance, value, customer care and desirability. A score for an average-rated product is a meaningful ‘50%’, and not ‘90%’, which is common practice for a great many other publications.

We consider any product score above '50%' as a safe buy. The higher the score, the higher the recommendation from HEXUS to buy. Simple, straightforward buying advice.

The rating is given in relation to the category the component competes in, therefore the card is evaluated with respect to our 'mid-range components' criteria.

79%

XFX Radeon HD 4850 XXX 512MB (HD-485X-YDDC)

HEXUS Awards


XFX Radeon HD 4850 XXX 512MB (HD-485X-YDDC)

HEXUS Where2Buy

The card is available, in stock, for £124.99 from Dabs.co.uk.

HEXUS Right2Reply

At HEXUS, we invite the companies whose products we test to comment on our articles. If any company representatives for the products reviewed choose to respond, we'll publish their commentary here verbatim.



HEXUS Forums :: 20 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Hi Tarinder - if you're reading could you please confirm whether the ASUS 4850 you use in these comparisons is the old version with the single slot reference cooler? The ASUS EAH4850 currently available from most etailers has a custom dual-slot fansink, and (while I've not put any heavy load through it yet!) I've found the one I bought last week tends to idle at around 43 degrees…
scaryjim
Hi Tarinder - if you're reading could you please confirm whether the ASUS 4850 you use in these comparisons is the old version with the single slot reference cooler? The ASUS EAH4850 currently available from most etailers has a custom dual-slot fansink, and (while I've not put any heavy load through it yet!) I've found the one I bought last week tends to idle at around 43 degrees…

Yup, +1
It's the old version, and I'll now note that in the text.

Thanks for your advices, though. :)
Not that I'm looking to buy at the moment, but this is the price bracket I'd usually be looking at. You've run the bang 4 buck at 1920 x 1200, but I reckon they'd be a fair proportion of people looking at 1680 x 1050 (myself included) at this price range. It might even be the more popular resolution at this price point.

Wouldn't take up too much space to include both :) If nothing else, it would be interesting to see if the figures stayed proportional, or if different cards were better at different resolutions.

(& yes I know the individual figures are all in the article, but the bang 4 buck is a very good instant summary.)

Straying even further off topic, what would be great would be a round up review including current cards but also from a bit further back every now and again. I'm on a vanilla 8800GT. I keep seeing lots of references to how the new 250 is essentially the same chip, just die-shrunk and higher clocks, but very little about how much difference that makes in performance. I'm sure they'll be people on old 7 series nvidia cards and equiv ATI cards who would be interested in just how much better the newer stuff is as well. Would probably only need 2 or 3 games to give a clear illustration of the likely increase in performance.

(fingers crossed you haven't done this recently and I missed it….)
Could someone from hexus please confirm wheather this is a custom design PCB or a refernace design.

Many thanks