facebook rss twitter

Review: Double trouble: Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 in CrossFire

by Tarinder Sandhu on 12 September 2008, 09:02

Tags: Radeon HD 4670 512MB, ATI Radeon HD 4670, AMD (NYSE:AMD), Sapphire, ATi Technologies (NYSE:AMD), PC

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qapb6

Add to My Vault: x

Final thoughts

Recommending a multi-GPU graphics subsystem is always tinged with a little danger. The requirements for usage mean that you need to have a CrossFire-compatible motherboard, and upgrading to one just to use multi-GPUs is not reason enough alone.

Then there are the inherent potential problems that may surface with rendering on two GPUs and the associated profiles and optimisations that need to be made by the drivers.

Knowing this, we still reckon that two Radeon HD 4670 GDDR3 cards make some kind of sense if your graphics outlay is around £100. For that money you receive greater multi-monitor support and, at times, comfortably higher performance than any single-GPU card can provide, because Radeon HD 4670 GDDR3 is such a good GPU for the money.

We've demonstrated that there is more than one way to receive considerable graphics-related value, and we'd urge ATI's add-in board partners to go the extra mile and create a single-PCB Gemini board, for the hell of it, and let the consumer decide if they'd rather opt for a GeForce 9800 GT, Radeon HD 4850, or Radeon HD 4670 X2 - all would be good for around £100.

Bottom line: the mainstream maestro, Radeon HD 4670, doubles-up rather nicely, and if you're not averse to running two GPUs in a mid-range system, they may well be the best way to higher performance.

HEXUS Awards

Gaming HEXUS Speed

Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 XF 1,024MB


The Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB can be purchased for £57.99 here. Just double-up for near-double performance.


HEXUS Forums :: 14 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Interesting review :)

One thing though, the colors of those graphs looked almost identical. I think they need to be changed ASAP, it was a little confusing looking at them at first.
But would you risk the possibility of crippled performance in some games for the sake of saving maybe £10 and getting a (probably) unperceivable performance increase?

I highly doubt it.

This comes close to breaking the rule of “SLI/CF is only for the ultra high end rigs at monster resolutions” but shouldn't be enough to tempt someone away from buying a 4850 or 9800GT in place of it.

Give me a 20% performance difference for the same cost as a single card and then I'll talk.

You also don't compare idle / load power useage and noise levels. Both of which I can only imagine would be worse than a single card solution…(even though it's a lower powered card). However the possibility to have two lower power card both passively cooled instead of one larger card which is impossible to passively cool…now that's an interesting thought :)

Edit: Typo bottom of page 5, should read "£100 to £110" I suspect.
I was suprised it didn't mention the possibility of buying one £50 card now, and then pairing a 2nd one in xfire in a few months time. Helps you spread the cost and in theory, the second card will be cheaper as costs drop.

I have no idea how quickly card prices drop though at this end of the market - is is just that by the time you buy the 2nd card, they'll be something newer and better value out??
GaryRW,

You've answered your own question.

The market changes so quickly that recommending buying a card six months down the line is fraught with potential problems.

We wanted to see what the performance of two cards was like, compared to a Radeon HD 4850.
Jmatt110
Interesting review :)

One thing though, the colors of those graphs looked almost identical. I think they need to be changed ASAP, it was a little confusing looking at them at first.

We're still experimenting with the graphs. I thought that this method, where the GPU companies are clearly defined, would be better, as the cards position on the graphs doesn't change.

Let me know if you still think differently and we'll change it.