facebook rss twitter

Review: Sapphire (AMD) Radeon HD 4670: bullying the mainstream market

by Tarinder Sandhu on 10 September 2008, 09:09

Tags: Radeon HD 4670 512MB, ATI Radeon HD 4670, AMD (NYSE:AMD), Sapphire, ATi Technologies (NYSE:AMD), PC

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qapbb

Add to My Vault: x

Final thoughts

Coming in at a projected £50, including VAT, for a vanilla version of the card and purportedly hard-launching this week, the Radeon HD 4670 brings all of the 4-series goodness to the mainstream.

ATI fits in practically more of everything with this card: more shading, texturing, and antialiasing performance. Harnessed together, the underlying technologies for Radeon HD 4670 GDDR3 make it the fastest graphics card in its pricing sector, and the 2D multimedia feature-set isn't bad.

To put the rendering power of the card in to some kind of perspective, it has a higher GFLOPs throughput (math ability) than the R600 - Radeon HD 2900 XT - a GPU launched less than 18 months ago and, at the time, ATI's supposed saviour at the high-end of the market.

There are obvious concessions towards saving costs, of course, including a bandwidth-starving 128-bit memory bus and GDDR3 memory that, perhaps, could have been a bit quicker, but there's also a lot to like here.

Performance is obviously good, handily thrashing GeForce 9500 GT 256MB and previous-generation Radeon HD 3650 512MB cards and, on rare occasion, eclipsing the benchmarks laid down by a Radeon HD 3850 256MB. The HEXUS.bang4buck graph highlights this in, literally, graphic fashion.

It's difficult to see a hole in the Radeon HD 4670 argument, given the price, and NVIDIA will have no other performance-related answer than to further chop prices of its mid-range SKUs. We can foresee GeForce 9600 GSO dropping down to £60, or less, as a result.

Bottom line: ATI has set a new standard in the mainstream discrete graphics-card market by providing a lot - be it 2D or 3D - for not very much. Speaking with pragmatism, fast-paced gaming at 1,680x1,050 is now eminently possible on a £50 ($79) card, so it's good news for the consumer.

ATI will further distil Radeon 4-series goodness to a number of lower-specified SKUs in weeks to come, and we wait with bated breath to see NVIDIA's response. Yes, GeForce 9600 GT is better, but it's a lot more expensive, relatively speaking.

Sapphire falls or succeeds in relation to the core technology, and as Radeon HD 4670 is rather good, it's on to a winner.

HEXUS Awards

Gaming HEXUS Labs

Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB


The Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB can be purchased for £57.99 here.


HEXUS Forums :: 23 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Odd choices of output connections on the reference design, good to see them changed by msi. Amazing how much things change over 18 months, wonder what cards we'll be looking at in March 2010?
Wow! The performance for the money is amazing, great for budget builds. I can see nvidia probably lowering the prices again (this time with the 9600 series :D)
Why the graphs in flash format?

I don't like them. They may look pretty, but they convey less information than plan 2D graphs as simple images. They also cause my browser to consume more memory and CPU than it would otherwise. (And Firefox is bad enough at that without any encouragement). Also, if I where viewing the site on my 64 bit linux box at home, I would not be able to see the graphs at all, as flash support is fairly flaky, so I usually leave it turned off as it often causes browser crashes.

Please go back to normal graphs, or if you must display them in 3D, please use SVG, with is an official W3C standard that should supported by all browsers, usually without excessive resource consumption.
Hi,

I'm developing on a 64-bit Linux system, and yes flash is a little flaky at times, but it works.

The site will fall-back to a table of results in the event that the user has flash turned off, or simply doesn't have flash.

We chose to use a flash-based graphing engine for various reasons. Sufficient to say it was the best choice for us.

I contest the fact that they convey less information. Currently they more or less match what our old graphs presented, however there's a lot more we can do with them, but as it's a new feature we haven't built upon it yet.
Thoses are some impressive figures - I always knew the 9500GT was a bit sucky, but this has proved it!

Forgive my ignorance but would this work in Hybrid Crossfire on a 790GX board? If it could leverage some performance benefit from the IGP that would make a much more realistic and affordable “HTPC for occasional gaming” than anything we've seen before.