facebook rss twitter

Review: AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

by Tarinder Sandhu on 17 March 2021, 13:01

Tags: AMD (NYSE:AMD)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaeqbq

Add to My Vault: x

Conclusion

...the $479 recommended asking fee is too expensive given what's on offer.

In a logical move to extend the reach of the latest RDNA 2 gaming architecture, AMD's Radeon RX 6700 XT arrives armed with a new interpretation of Navi primed for lower cost and higher frequencies.

AMD's decision choices lead to a card whose performance is, on average, around the same as GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and naturally some way behind the RTX 3070 and RX 6800.

Conveniently ignoring severe stock shortages and price premiums for a moment, the $479 recommended asking fee is too expensive given what's on offer. The $399 rival RTX 3060 Ti works just as well and offers better ray tracing and DLSS capability to boot, albeit with only 8GB of VRAM compared to 12GB here.

Perhaps AMD is playing it smart with the knowledge that shortages will continue into the year and so why bother with a matching $399 price. This card could be $599 and it'll still sell, such is the time we live in.

More fundamentally, AMD has successfully extended the reach of RX 6000 Series to a wider audience, albeit with a card that's not as attractive as the stablemate RX 6800 or RTX 3060 Ti and RTX 3070.

The Good
 
The Bad
Solid framerates at QHD
Good MBA thermals and noise
12GB VRAM
 
Stock issues aplenty
Rival GeForces better at RRPs
No DLSS-like capability



AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB

HEXUS.where2buy

TBC.

HEXUS.right2reply

At HEXUS, we invite the companies whose products we test to comment on our articles. If any company representatives for the products reviewed choose to respond, we'll publish their commentary here verbatim.



HEXUS Forums :: 25 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!




Relative poor power effiency! :(
We agree that RX 6800, RTX 3060 Ti and RTX 3070 are better with respect to energy efficiency. Hardly a surprise given the 230W TDP on show here.
I think they left too big a gap in performance between the 6800 and the 6700XT.

It might have been OK if the pricing gap was also as large but they have gone maybe too high compared to green team.

Feels like a misstep this time from AMD. Maybe the 6700 non XT will be a sweeter spot for price / performance.
Tarinder
We agree that RX 6800, RTX 3060 Ti and RTX 3070 are better with respect to energy efficiency. Hardly a surprise given the 230W TDP on show here.

I have a SFF PC,and regret not nabbing a RTX3060TI on launch day(almost did). Wanted to wait and see what AMD would come up with. Apparently it was overpriced dissapointment.
Small + fast should be good for production, as Hexus note, shame that the end user ends up paying the power price for it, though I think at this point anything to improve supply is good.

Rasterisation performance looks good, but RT takes surprisingly massive hit compared to the 6800/XT - seems like number of texture units is more important than clock speed when it comes to RT. This also previews RT performance for consoles I guess, and suggests there's going to be a lot of optimisation by game devs.