facebook rss twitter

Review: Intel Core i5-4210Y (22nm Haswell)

by Parm Mann on 11 February 2014, 15:00

Tags: Intel (NASDAQ:INTC), Sony (NYSE:SNE)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qacamv

Add to My Vault: x

Conclusion

Intel has possessed a fast and unchallenged microarchitecture for a number of years. The goal is to bring that level of performance to increasingly-popular form factors such as all-in-ones, convertible laptops and tablet PCs. For the first time, the top-of-the-range Core i7-4770K desktop part isn't the chip we're excited about. As the industry moves from components towards solutions, it's the prospect of a Haswell-powered Surface Pro offering an always-connected Windows 8.1 experience with true desktop performance, all-day battery life, and, who knows, a fanless chassis, that really tickles our fancy.

Haswell's scalability is its biggest asset, yet while the architecture holds promise, the real question remains unanswered; has Intel done enough to revitalise a faltering PC industry? And will Haswell chips really inspire a new breed of thin, light, long-lasting and always-connected PCs? Only time will tell.

The above quote is taken from our review of the Core i7-4770K, dated June 1st 2013, and it puts forth a couple of questions that are still relevant today.

In an increasingly-mobile world, the challenge facing Intel's latest CPU architectures is not one of delivering maximum performance - that's something the chip giant has rarely struggled to do - but rather in delivering the right amount of performance in an ultra-low-power package.

Enabling desktop-like performance and all-day battery life in ultra-thin, portable PCs is very much the name of the game, and the Core i5-4210Y is clear evidence of this evolutionary shift in Intel processor design. Combining the CPU, GPU and PCH into a single-chip solution, this energy-efficient chip is set to become a driving force behind Windows tablets in 2014, and if the Sony Vaio Tap 11 is anything to go by, performance expectations are going to be met.

During use, the speed of the i5-4210Y chip is akin to a premium Ultrabook: Windows boots almost instantly, apps are quick to load, multi-tasking isn't a problem and the system as a whole feels fluent and responsive. Not bad going for an 11.5W processor married to just 4GB of RAM.

Yet, while the signs are mostly promising, there's still work to be done. Intel's IGP remains a long way from offering a portable gaming experience, the TDP hasn't quite dropped low enough to enable fanless Core i5 designs, and the price remains an obstacle for mainstream adoption. Haswell Y-Series processors offer the best Intel tablet experience to date, but we'll have to wait for next-generation Broadwell to see if the promise of a fast, powerful and fanless Windows tablet with iPad-matching battery life can be realised.

The Good

Capable core performance
CPU and PCH in a single-chip package
Energy efficiency bodes well for battery life
Brings desktop-like performance to portable PCs

The Bad

Lofty price tag
Mediocre integrated graphics
Not quite efficient enough to go fanless

HEXUS.awards


Intel Core i5-4210Y

HEXUS.where2buy

The Intel Core i5-4210Y is a socketed processor available in bespoke systems such as the Sony Vaio Tap 11.

HEXUS.right2reply

At HEXUS, we invite the companies whose products we test to comment on our articles. If any company representatives for the products reviewed choose to respond, we'll publish their commentary here verbatim.



*UK-based HEXUS community members are eligible for free delivery and priority customer service through the SCAN.care@HEXUS forum.



HEXUS Forums :: 11 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
we've come to the conclusion that the Tap 11 is too compromised to warrant serious consideration. Build quality is mediocre, the plastic flap covering the USB port is nothing short of horrible, the stand doesn't prevent the tablet from toppling, it's virtually impossible to use on your lap, you can't physically connect the keyboard during use, the pen hangs onto a weak clip just waiting to be lost, and to wrap it all up, it costs Ā£1,050 for a Core i5 model.

LOL. :laugh: Proof I guess that Hexus don't do paid-for glossed-over reviews. At least not for Sony anyway!
Would be interesting how this stands up against the new Z3000 series atom processors and their graphics capabilities and processing power. I assume that they will use slightly more power but since they have standard using these new measurements I don't know my S from my T (DP).
Is it me or is the 4210Y looking like a pretty terrible chip? They havent done anything clever here to reduce the power usage, probably not even the best bins…

The 4210Y has 1.5 GHz base and 1.9 GHz turbo and a 4200 @ 850 Mhz where as the 4200U has a base of 1.6 GHz and 2.6 Ghz turbo and a 4400 @ 1000 Mhz… the 4200U is miles above it as you see in your testing yet it only uses a handful of watts more in general use and gaming its got double the performance! Yes gaming requires more performance but who in the world is happy with 15fps on a game? No one I reckon, atleast 30 fps could be tolerable for some games :P.

Seems like a terrible product as its the same price too, simply cut back the clocks a lot and watched the TDP drop yet you pay more, simply buy the 4200U and drop it back yourself I am sure that will use similar power then… infact could you perhaps test that? Pretty sure you could underclock them could be way off though!.

Still at least its clear why Sony are moving out! Terrible kit, this is the problem with Sony they sat on their asses for far too long just like TVs they made great stuff years ago then stalled and just went by their name instead of quality and innovation which meant everyone passed them.
Got a Lenovo Yoga 11s with one of these. Agree with the review - ran fine on my recent holiday with Firefox having a great number of tabs open so can't see a reason why this isn't enough power for a day to day laptop for a non-power user. Would be interested to see a head to head against one of the quad core atoms.

The 4250u is bloody impressive chip though, getting that down to 6-8w in the coming generations will mean that the majority of users would be happy with a convertible + dock type setup for home / away use.
Hicks12
Seems like a terrible product as its the same price too, simply cut back the clocks a lot and watched the TDP drop yet you pay more, simply buy the 4200U and drop it back yourself I am sure that will use similar power then… infact could you perhaps test that? Pretty sure you could underclock them could be way off though!.

When overclocking you reach a point where power usage starts to climb out of proportion with increasing performance and I imagine the opposite is true, there are diminishing returns from reducing clock speed and voltage, performance drops off unreasonably for the savings.

This is why there is no 1 CPU architecture that scales from <1W smartphones to >200W servers.

I think the 4210Y is an attempt to fill the small wattage and performance gap between higher-end Atom and the 4200U, I think it's something of a fudge for the scenario, Core doesn't scale well down below ~15W and Atom probably doesn't scale up well above ~5W.