facebook rss twitter

Intel 32nm Core i5 661 Westmere CPU+GPU chip review

by Tarinder Sandhu on 4 January 2010, 05:00

Tags: Intel (NASDAQ:INTC)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qavft

Add to My Vault: x

So what does Westmere bring to the mainstream table?

That's a wrap of the new CPU-and-GPU architecture, together with supporting chipsets and a couple of retail boards.

What Intel is bringing to bear with the new chips is the first-ever integration of CPU and GPU on one package. In this case, they're based on two separate dies that are connected  by a high-speed interconnect.

The fusion of the two is made possible - both economically and technically - by a breaking up the modular Nehalem architecture and designing a 32nm dual-core CPU part, thereby saving on power-draw and die-space.

Integrated graphics also see a bump from the previous-generation X4500 HD, too, and the amalgamation makes sense on paper.

CPU performance should be, at the very least, reasonable when compared with incumbent chips in the same pricing bracket, primarily down to the hyper-threading and Turbo Boost benefits that come part and parcel with most models.

Codenamed Clarkdale for the desktop and Arrandale for the mobile environment, there's logic in debuting the Westmere architecture in mainstream form. Intel doesn't want to cannibalise sales of premium 45nm quad-core models right now by releasing 32nm variants, so it's chosen older Core 2 Duo and, to some extent, Core 2 Quad as the sights in the firing line.

The pricing of the various desktop Intel Clarkdale models brings also brings practically the whole AMD Phenom II X3 and X4 range into play. The comparison is a little skewed because AMD's chips don't have integrated graphics, but tallying up system costs, including AMD's IGP-powered chipsets, should prove interesting, to say the least.

We've managed to come this far without explicitly mentioning performance. Let's right this wrong as we take a look at the desktop Core i5 661 and compare it against its peers. Head on over to here for some benchmarking frenzy.


HEXUS Forums :: 22 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Nice review(s), though I'm getting thoroughly confused by Intel's model numbers - not sure there's anything Hexus could do to try and explain it any better though!
Great review. I can see that I'll be coming back to that quite frequently.
So, it would of been better to drop the IGP and bang these babies into a P55 board and get some good old Core 2 loving type performance/overclocking. Joking/wishful thinking aside those TDP numbers are quite impressive, again though the pricing of these chips is going to be the deal breaker and we don't get any real insight into there performance when we only get to view the highest performing part of 6 CPU's :\
Hmm, now that Intel have the “mainstream” area covered, it looks like the best way to go upgrading from a Q6600 is an i5-750. 3Delight and Ableton push my Q6600 too hard now… :(
Ok I get the innovation award but 80% for this 661? Come on it loses horribly to the Phenom II at the same price and what about the Athlon II 620 at half the price almost?

Can we please stop giving intel high marks by default? This is a weak product on price performance - innovative yes but nowhere near deserving of an 80% award.