facebook rss twitter

PDC '08: Microsoft demonstrates Windows 7's sex appeal

by Parm Mann on 29 October 2008, 14:46

Tags: Windows 7, Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qapx4

Add to My Vault: x

The wow could finally start now

The good-looking treats aren't restricted to the taskbar area, either. Users will find that Windows 7 has been refined throughout, and there's an arsenal of pleasing toys to play with. Vista's development time may have been spent largely on re-writing the subsystem, but it's clear to see that the team behind Windows 7 has had the time to focus on user experience.

Customisation will play a pivotal role in Windows 7, and Themes will make something of a comeback. The built-in personalisation control panel will allow users to create and share themes - which encompass a desktop wallpaper, glass colour, screensaver and sound scheme.

Other Vista features that have failed to live up to expectations have also been re-jigged. Take Gadgets for example, Microsoft has done away with the sidebar allowing for Gadgets to live freely anywhere on the desktop. Handy for users with limited on-screen real estate, but what if you want to see your Gadgets easily? Not a problem, "peek" through the windows at them. It all appears to be very well thought out.

On top of refining what Vista has to offer, there's a selection of new goodies, too. Dragging any window to the top of your screen will maximise it, and taking it to the left or right will snap it to the side and re-size at 50 per cent for easy side-by-side tiling.

There's also greatly-improved support for multiple-monitors, be they landscape or portrait, a revised Media Center, and an option for new interaction via multi-touch. Windows 7's built-in multi-touch functionality will support all the usual tricks such as scrolling through web pages, flicking back and forth, and zooming or rotating with multiple fingers. Vista's impressive speech-recognition functionality ultimately failed to provide a useful everyday alternative to the keyboard and mouse, but Windows 7's touch functionality could prove to be more successful.

Going back to Sinofsky's pledge of improved performance, Windows 7's biggest benefit could be that users upgrading from Vista won't suffer performance degradation as they did when upgrading from XP. It could, in fact, be quite the contrary. Windows 7 is said to be so well refined that users switching from Vista to 7 will notice significant performance improvements on their existing hardware.

Reassuring those with hardware concerns, Sinofsky joyfully claims that his current personal laptop is a 1GHz netbook with 1GB of RAM and Windows 7 as its operating system. When in use, half the system's memory remains free, he says. Should his claims be reflected in the final product, Windows 7 could simultaneously help bring Windows XP and Windows Vista to a close.

From what little we've seen of Windows 7 so far, we'll confidently predict that it'll bring smiles to the faces of the Vista faithful, as well as raise an eyebrow from the XP or Mac-lovin' crowd. Microsoft expects a public beta of Windows 7 to be available in early 2009 and we'll be keeping a partition available in anticipation.

 

Images provided by the Windows Team blog.



HEXUS Forums :: 20 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Good article.

Pictures good, but video better to show the interaction. There's some here: http://www.neowin.net/news/live/08/10/28/introducing-the-windows-7-ui which help you make sense of it.
I like all the new features shown so far, Vista enhanced the appearance of Windows and W7 is further enhancing the appearance of Vista, with the kernel optimisations hopefully Windows 7 will be a better OS allround.

For a more in depth look check out dangels link above.

Here's a copy and paste of my comment about the UI changes from a different topic made yesterday: -


I like the new enhancements / changes to the taskbar it looks like merging the taskbar and quicklaunch to give microsoft's take on a dock. The Jump lists and window preview look good aswell, good thing they did away with the sidebar as it was rubbish, the see through windows feature makes the gadgets a little more practical to use but I'd probably still not bother with them.

A few good new features but what I'm waiting to find out about W7 is whether it is subscription based or not and how much improvement has been made to system performance.
Not currently a fan of having a thicker taskbar, but I'll reserve judgement until I see it in use. I presume if they've not majorly redeveloped the architecture of the OS, apps designed for Vista should have minimal compatibility problems?

As for the gadgets; I like to be able to see my gadgets whenever I look at them, and not have to mouseover a button to see them. Especially if I'm checking them to find out which processes are eating my quad core if I got a slowdown - I don't want the OS to have to do anything processor intensive, as there would both be a lag, if my cores were maxed out, and might incorrectly show explorer as one of the CPU-hogging processes.
Equally, I might be playing a game on my projector and want to see how much memory/CPU it's using on a secondary monitor. Can't do that if I have to mouseover the button to see the gadgets.

Multimonitor support sounds good - currently I'm using Ultramon, and can't complain with how well it works and integrates into Vista - but it's not free, and I'm sure lots of people are missing out. The ability to click a button to switch which monitor the program is appearing in alone is invaluable, especially if you don't always use all the monitors at once - for example, a projector which take time to warm up/has higher running cost.

One problem with Vista I hope'll be fixed is the lack of shortcuts readily available. Two examples: Network connections and Display properties. In XP you could get to Network connections by clicking on Start Menu>Network connections - simple. In Vista you have to go along about four links - start menu>network>network and sharing centre>network connections, opening up three different windows en route. It's a pain when you use your laptop to connect to two different networks, using different IP addresses, and have to configure the network settings manually.
Again, with the Display properties - in XP you could right click the desktop and go to properties, and everything you need pops up in a dialog box. In Vista you have to go to Control Panel and Personalisation and Display Settings, and that only lets you change resolution - the dialog box in XP let you change Desktop and Screensaver settings etc as well. Again, a pain when you have multiple monitors and are activating/deactivating/changing resolution on these, which I do fairly frequently.
Fortunately I found that by copying the old shortcut links from XP and pasting them into quicklaunch on Vista actually works, so if anyone else was wondering how to open those easily, that's the solution.

Thus ends the world's longest post.
Sorry :-p
miniyazz
Not currently a fan of having a thicker taskbar, but I'll reserve judgement until I see it in use. I presume if they've not majorly redeveloped the architecture of the OS, apps designed for Vista should have minimal compatibility problems?

The core of the OS is the same, so yes no driver problems (probably) etc.

miniyazz
As for the gadgets; I like to be able to see my gadgets whenever I look at them, and not have to mouseover a button to see them. Especially if I'm checking them to find out which processes are eating my quad core if I got a slowdown - I don't want the OS to have to do anything processor intensive, as there would both be a lag, if my cores were maxed out, and might incorrectly show explorer as one of the CPU-hogging processes.
Equally, I might be playing a game on my projector and want to see how much memory/CPU it's using on a secondary monitor. Can't do that if I have to mouseover the button to see the gadgets.

Not sure what you mean here? Gadget sit ont the desktop so can be on your secondary monitor - the mouseover stuff is to do with applications, not gadgets.


miniyazz
One problem with Vista I hope'll be fixed is the lack of shortcuts readily available. Two examples: Network connections and Display properties. In XP you could get to Network connections by clicking on Start Menu>Network connections - simple. In Vista you have to go along about four links - start menu>network>network and sharing centre>network connections, opening up three different windows en route. It's a pain when you use your laptop to connect to two different networks, using different IP addresses, and have to configure the network settings manually.
Again, with the Display properties - in XP you could right click the desktop and go to properties, and everything you need pops up in a dialog box. In Vista you have to go to Control Panel and Personalisation and Display Settings, and that only lets you change resolution - the dialog box in XP let you change Desktop and Screensaver settings etc as well. Again, a pain when you have multiple monitors and are activating/deactivating/changing resolution on these, which I do fairly frequently.
Fortunately I found that by copying the old shortcut links from XP and pasting them into quicklaunch on Vista actually works, so if anyone else was wondering how to open those easily, that's the solution.

Quicklaunch is dead - and as for wifi connections there's a new much easier way to switch (see http://www.neowin.net/news/live/08/10/28/introducing-the-windows-7-ui)
dangel
Good article.

Pictures good, but video better to show the interaction. There's some here: http://www.neowin.net/news/live/08/10/28/introducing-the-windows-7-ui which help you make sense of it.
Thank you for the link. It had some good supplementary information, and the videos were useful.

I like the fact that “touch” is becoming more “mainstream”.

It looks very “Appley” from what I can see. That's not necessarily a bad thing though.


One thing, though: I hope that I can still have my desktop, how I like it. I.e.


(1920x1200 -> 960x600)


I showed somebody I worked for how I have my sidebar, and he has it like that, now, too.

I prefer it because you can see more open programs at once, it's out of the way on widescreen monitors and it's “different” (which gets people talking).