facebook rss twitter

AMD calls NVIDIA's marketing bluff

by Sylvie Barak on 22 October 2009, 18:29

Tags: AMD (NYSE:AMD)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qauku

Add to My Vault: x

Lock down

Indeed, Huddy, who worked at NVIDIA before joining AMD several years ago, even branded NVIDIA's recent GTC event a "marketing exercise," and expressed frustration over the recent issues over PhysX and anti-aliasing in the Batman PC game.

"We believe in open standards and execution" said Huddy, maintaining "locking-in is not something we've ever done, no code is locked to our hardware." Huddy went on to say "everybody loves us; Microsoft because we got there early [with DX11 hardware], game developers because we're working with them, consumers because we have the hardware available."

"We're trying to do the right thing," Huddy went on, telling HEXUS about AMD's efforts with both DX11 and Stream computing. "Windows 7 makes things like transcoding so much simpler," he added, to emphasise the importance he ascribed to working with Microsoft on GPU acceleration.

 

 

Huddy explained how even his mother had found benefits in using DX11 to speed up home video transcoding on Windows Media player, but concluded "Maybe NVIDIA just doesn't care enough about my mother." 

 



HEXUS Forums :: 7 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
A high powered DX11 graphics card and an elderly woman? This makes no sense.
I love ATI cards over nVidia cards; I have both in high spec variants.

However, nVidia CUDA documentation is a million times better than ATI Stream documentation. This is the one section I'm really disgusted about with ATI.
borandi
I love ATI cards over nVidia cards; I have both in high spec variants.

However, nVidia CUDA documentation is a million times better than ATI Stream documentation. This is the one section I'm really disgusted about with ATI.

ATi will probably drop stream for DirectCompute as it is more widely used and will be even more so because of DX11.
I hope something happens about it soon because I'm sick of proprietary standards such as PhysX being used excluding ATI users from using it.
It would still require a standard library for the physics processing itself, although DirectCompute/OpenCL would be a sound backend for a standard physics library.