facebook rss twitter

Intel launches Xeon D-1520 and D-1540 64-bit SoCs

by Mark Tyson on 9 March 2015, 16:00

Tags: Intel (NASDAQ:INTC)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qacpsa

Add to My Vault: x

Intel has just launched a pair of Xeon Processor D-1500 SoCs. It has chosen to launch these 14nm processors to meet its goal of "Extending Intelligence to the Edge," and bring its data centre chip technology to both the 'data centre edge' and 'network edge' – simply to help bridge the gap between traditional data centres and connected devices. Therefore devices Intel expects to see these processors deployed in include hosting and web server equipment and routers, wireless base stations and NAS devices.

The first ever Intel Xeon SoCs, the D-1520 and D-1540, are now in production. These processors provided up to 3.4X the performance of an Intel Atom C2750 in a dynamic web serving platform test undertaken by Intel.* The new Xeons are said to boast up to 1.7X better performance per watt in the same example task.*

These 64-bit SoCs have the following key configurations:

  • Intel Xeon D-1520: 4 cores / 8 threads, 2.2GHz, 45W
  • Intel Xeon D-1540: 8 cores / 16 threads, 2GHz, 45W

Further specs the two new Xeon SoCs have in common include:

  • Up to 5X network bandwidth thanks to integrated 2 x 10GbE Intel Ethernet
  • Integrated I/O such as 24x PCIe 3, 8x PCIe 2, 6x SATA3, 4x USB etc
  • Memory architecture based upon DDR4 DIMMs with up to 12MB L3 cache
  • Up to 128GB of addressable memory

Despite these processors only just entering mass production Intel has secured over 50 design wins for them. The wins are in the vital 'underlying infrastructure' of devices, data and digital services which Intel predicts to grow by 10X by 2020. New products destined to pack Intel Xeon D-1500 SoCs are split pretty evenly between the three main categories of Network & IoT, Microservers and Storage Devices - as illustrated below.

It's interesting to see Intel use its Xeon branding and technology in this SoC market space for network appliances and IoT devices. ARM is also targeting the billions of devices which are expected to make up the IoT in coming years. With so many devices expected to be connected to the internet in the coming years there's probably plenty of room for both corporations to prosper - but of course they have to fight tooth and nail to carve out their respective territories and that battle - with both hardware and software - has definitely started.

*Up to 3.4x better performance on Dynamic Web Serving

  • Intel® Xeon Processor D-based reference platform with one Pre-Production Xeon Processor D (8C, 1.9GHz, 45W, Turbo Boost Enabled, Hyper-Threading enabled, 64GB memory (4x16GB DDR4-2133 RDIMM ECC), 2x10GBase-T X552,

3x S3700 SATA SSD, Fedora* 20 (3.17.8-200.fc20.x86_64, Nginx* 1.4.4, Php-fpm* 15.4.14, memcached* 1.4.14, Simultaneous users=43844

  • Supermicro SuperServer* 5018A-TN4 with one Intel Atom Processor C2750 (8C, 2.4GHz,20W), Turbo Boost Enabled, 32GB memory (4x8GB DDR3-1600 SO-DIMM ECC), 1x10GBase-T X520, 2x S3700 SATA SSD, Ubuntu*

14.10(3.16.0-23 generic), Nginx* 1.4.4, Php-fpm* 15.4.14, memcached* 1.4.14, Simultaneous users=12896

HEXUS Forums :: 14 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Very nice, now to wait for prices…..

8 cores/16 threads in 45w with 2 x 10GBe…..yes please!
Product page and press release just published.

“Pricing & Availability

Intel Xeon Processor D-1520 (4-core) $199.00
Intel Xeon Processor D-1540 (8-core) $581.00

The products are available today. The extended Intel Xeon processor D product family including microserver, network, storage and IoT optimized SoCs is expected to be available in the second half of this year.”
Will they be any advantage in a gaming PC? What socket are they?
So these use 14nm Atom cores? Or 14nm Broadwell cores?
What is more weird is that as intel start releasing more broadwell chips, it appears they are all lower clocked than the previous gen. Even with the small bump in perf per core, I'm beginning to think broadwell will be a benchmark disaster.

Would like to be proven wrong but something is up.