facebook rss twitter

QOTW: what would you do if you had more processing power?

by Parm Mann on 8 August 2008, 10:54

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaorh

Add to My Vault: x

Since the introduction of the microprocessor in the 1970s, our central processing units (CPUs) have rapidly become more powerful, and often smaller in size, too.

In the early '70s, processors were able to carry out just thousands of instructions per second. Today, processors in our home computers are easily capable of performing thousands of millions of instructions per second.

Moore's law, which states that the number of transistors that can be inexpensively placed on an integrated circuit is increasing exponentially, doubling approximately every two years, continues to hold true.

As we move into an era of multi-core computing, the systems in our homes are beginning to provide performance similar to that which was once deemed available only from supercomputers.

Intel, the world's largest semiconductor manufacturer, has its sights set on designing CPUs that perform with up-to petaFLOP performance. But we want to know, what would you, the consumer, do with such processing power?

Aside from the obvious "I'd do more of the same, but quicker", what else might you begin to do? Will increased performance urge you to try something new? Will you try your hand at video editing, will you become a gamer, or will you use the processing power to help find cures for diseases?

There's endless possibilities, and we're asking you, our readers, what would you do if you had more processing power? Let us know in the HEXUS.community forums.



HEXUS Forums :: 18 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
CPU = encoding power! encoding takes forever.
For me I will probably rip DVDs more, as it gets much quicker to encode them.
For the majority of consumers, buy the most powerfull chip they can afford, to use word with.
Check if 42 is the real answer.
Computer processors are continuing to provide a rapid increase in performance, but we ask, what else might you do with that extra oomph?
Good question. Very, very good question.

I can't think of anything I currently do that really requires even the power of today's mid-range processors, let alone high-end ones or even more powerful future iterations.

So I'd do what I do now when replacing any current machines. I look at the price differential, and opt for something relatively modest. Currently, that would be at about the Ā£100 mark, so it's Q6600, E8400/E8500 level …. and that's for a machine where my usage is relatively demanding, like digital imaging or voice recognition. For a basic office machine, I'd go in a lot lower than even that.

I'm not interested, personally, in processing power for it's own sake, or in bragging rights, or in benchmark performance. If an increase in performance is such that I need a benchmark suite to tell the difference, it's not worth paying for. The ONLY performance that's worth paying for, in my view, is one where I can tell a real world, practical difference. If it means Photoshop filter runs in 30 seconds rather than a minute, it's worth it. If it changes from 1.000002 seconds to 1.000001 seconds, it ….. erm …. isn't worth it. To me.
Increase the size of my epeen.