facebook rss twitter

RapidShare has new plans to combat piracy

by Mark Tyson on 20 April 2012, 11:40

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qabfkb

Add to My Vault: x

Switzerland based file sharing company RapidShare has published a 3 page document about how they will help prevent pirates from using its cloud storage services. The document paints a picture of RapidShare as a responsible cloud storage service provider who “protect the intellectual property and copyright interests of creators”.

Following the fate of Megaupload in January, commentators have been wondering who is next for the chopping block. Companies that follow a seemingly similar business model to the now deceased Megaupload include RapidShare, MediaFire, 4shared and Rapidgator. These companies are easy to find, just search for any popular CD, DVD or game on Filestube.com to get lots of download links emanating from these sites. Yes, including RapidShare.

 

 RapidShare logo

 

However RapidShare say they are not concerned by the Megaupload closure and try and position themselves among more respectable cloud storage service providers like YouTube, Dropbox and SkyDrive from Microsoft.

In a statement RapidShare general counsel Daniel Raimer said "RapidShare has always embraced our obligation to protect the intellectual property and copyright interests of creators, today's announcement takes that obligation to a new level." He continued: "We want all stakeholders in the debate over online copyright infringement - customers, content providers, industry competitors, technology experts, policymakers, regulators, and others - to understand that RapidShare recognizes that piracy is a serious problem, that we're reinforcing our efforts to eradicate it, and that we're calling on other data logistics companies to do the same."

A key implementation detailed in the document is that user accounts will be terminated if there are a number of accusations of uploading copyrighted content. In some cases even user uploaded private files will be looked into by investigators. However the uploader gets 2 weeks notice of such an action, and is given time to either challenge the accusation or remove the files in question.

Two months ago, just one month after the Megaupload closure, RapidShare cut download speeds for free users. It said this action was a bid to fight piracy with it becoming the new preferred pirates file deposit. “RapidShare has been faced with a severe increase in free user traffic and unfortunately also in the amount of abuse of our service ever since, suggesting that quite a few copyright infringers have chosen RapidShare as their new hoster of choice for their illegal activities.” If you are cynical you might think that cutting speeds to free users might be a tool to get more people to sign up to the RapidShare premium services which are thrust into your face every time you go to the site. Kerching!

In March German courts ruled that RapidShare’s core functionality was within the law and the company has no responsibility to monitor uploaded files. Have RapidShare now done enough, or wriggled enough, to pacify Big Content providers and avoid the fate of Megaupload?



HEXUS Forums :: 7 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
In some cases even user uploaded private files will be looked into by investigators

I hate the cloud…
Biscuit
I hate the cloud…

So long is its not raining I don't mind the cloud
Download speed has been absolutely slow on Rapidshare for the last few years for free users.
I doubt anyone even uses them.
“RapidShare has been faced with a severe increase in free user traffic and unfortunately also in the amount of abuse of our service ever since, suggesting that quite a few copyright infringers have chosen RapidShare as their new hoster of choice for their illegal activities.” If you are cynical you might think that cutting speeds to free users might be a tool to get more people to sign up to the RapidShare premium services which are thrust into your face every time you go to the site. Kerching!
….
That is indeed a cynical way of looking at it, and you may well be right. But there's another way. If you have a premium account, then presumably you had to provide a way to pay for it, and that gives a much more direct link between a downloader's, and worse yet, uploader's identity than merely an IP, which may or may not link to the uploader's identity.

I've certainly had friends tell me that they download pirate stuff on occasion, but that no way would they provide credit card details to do it. It's not a lack of willingness to pay up. They didn't mind that. It's the traceability back to them. On the other hand, give them a safe, secure and guaranteed anonymous way to pay, and ….. ;)


…. Have RapidShare now done enough, or wriggled enough, to pacify Big Content providers and avoid the fate of Megaupload?
It's doubtful Big Content Providers will be unhappy unless illicit material is either totally eliminated (and I think everyone knows that's next to impossible, unless something changes in the technology), or at least, the levels of it are drastically cut.

But that's not really the relevant yardstick. The real yardstick is whether they've done enough to make it hard or impossible to convince a court that companies like Rapidshare have any legal liability for illicit material on their servers. And that is a far higher bar for Big Content to get over, because despite recent cases, like MegaUpload, the court's don't just rubber-stamp Big Content's wishes, and the MegaUpload case made it pretty clear that a major factor was the blatant nature of MegaUpload's activities. That will no doubt force the others to reign their necks in a fair bit, and at the very least, be a lot less blatant about what they offer. It'll be more of a “nudge, nudge, wink wink” deal than the in-yer-face attitude of MegaUpload.

Will that be enough, though?

Only time, and maybe a test case or two, will tell.
How many Sol-like stars are there in the universe? The only way to find out is to look at every single one of them at detail. In other words, big content has managed to back-door mass unwarranted searches of the general public's private property.

I hate this world.