facebook rss twitter

Rural broadband trials announced

by Sarah Griffiths on 21 October 2010, 10:39

Tags: UK Government

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qa2m6

Add to My Vault: x

Spending review survival

The rollout of next generation broadband is one of the few areas to survive the government's sweeping cuts of £83bn as part of its spending review.

In fact, it has announced a trial of super-fast broadband in Herefordshire, Cumbria, North Yorkshire and the Highlands will be part financed by the BBC, which will fork out £300m of the £530m cost. The rest of the cash will come from the digital switch-over budget, the BBC reported.

It is thought the scheme will benefit around 2m households out in the wilderness that currently cope will dial-up speeds. 

Chancellor George Osbourne reportedly said: "It will help encourage the growth of our creative industries as a key part of the new economy we are seeking to build."

Experts estimate around a third of the UK is without super-fast broadband, mainly because it is not economically worthwhile for companies to expand services to remote rural areas.

However, it was recently suggested that a scheme by BT to roll out fibre broadband to rural Cornwall, which received support from the EU, could serve as a blueprint of how to expand quicker web services to sparsely populated areas.

BT has also launched a competition where communities can gather votes to be considered for speedy broadband, with the five most popular getting the service. While its sounds like a great idea in theory, the competition has attracted some criticism as it will only consider and offer help to areas that have gathered over 1,000 votes, which could rule out some small villages.

Dr Charles Trotman, chairman of the Final Third First campaign reportedly warned the competition could create a ‘digital divide'.

He told the BBC: "Where do you find an exchange with a thousand people in a rural area? It is a good initiative but it has to be rethought or it will add to the urban/rural digital divide."



HEXUS Forums :: 6 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
As a bumpkin, living in rural Herefordshire - on blistering 512 kbps broadband - I'm quite excited by this news. :)

It still sounds a bit too good to be true though.

edit: I should note that I'm a terrible cynic. :)
edit2: Actually, I'm a really good cynic, because I'm terribly cynical.
I need more coffee.
which will fork out £300m of the £530m cost
Missing ‘m’ :)

This is good news, hopefully it means the exchange i'll be about 200m from will get an upgrade sooner rather than later. It will be interesting to see how close I can get to 8mbit when I move in a month.

The rest of the cash will come from the digital switch-over budget, the BBC reported.
If ever you want proof that the media only like bad news, this is it. The budget for digital switch over, which includes subsidised and free boxes, installation and support, has cost £230m less than was budgeted for. Yet all you hear about is when things run over budget. This is a particularly sensible way to spend the excess in my opinion. Again, sensible decisions are never highlighted in the media.
Bah, nothing for Devon then.

Personally I think that they should do it backwards - concentrate on the rural first and then the cities, as they cities already have decent connections
They could be there all day long trying to sort out all the rural areas. Would you draw a line anywhere? Like that one house in Northern Scotland surrounded in all directions by a clear margin of 20 miles (not outside the realms of possibility, although I don't know if it actually exists :p)
Problem with working backwards is that more paying punters live in cities…so more revenue. It's a vicious circle, no broadband means no-one is interested in faster broadband.