facebook rss twitter

Police discover Internet - launch e-crime strategy

by Scott Bicheno on 2 September 2009, 13:35

Tags: E-victims

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qatry

Add to My Vault: x

Planning to do something

Apparently inspired by the government's haste to start prosecuting illegal file sharers, the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) - which covers all the UK bar Scotland - has published its strategy for tackling e-crime over the next year and a half.

Despite the Internet having been around for a while, this is the first such strategy adopted by the police force and has been immediately condemned by independent e-crime advice site e-victims as "too little, too late".

The document, which is dated 28 May 2009 but has only just been released, commences with a paragraph of self-congratulation and goes on to explain that there's quite a lot of activity on the Internet these days. It then concedes: "We are starting from a low base", and warns that this document is just stage one on the road to actually doing something.

Jennifer Perry, the MD of e-victims, waded through further pages of bureaucratic self-justification to find this quote in the document: "Of particular concern is the belief by some victims that the police will not act if they report computer-related crime."

Perry thinks this is very much the case. "It is our experience, working with hundreds of e-victims, that most of the time police turn e-victims away," she said. "They refuse to take a report, they don't provide any practical advice, and if they refer e-victims to another organisation it is often to the wrong one."

She also points out that this strategy is focused on crimes concerning money, like fraud. More social crimes, which could include public humiliation or harassment, seem to be completely overlooked.

"Online harassment is a common example of a crime where we get frequent cries for help because the police simply refuse to take a report or assist the victim," said Perry. "Furthermore, they don't regard it as in their remit to inform victims that they can take the person to court themselves under Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and get a restraining order."

We would like to know your thoughts on e-crime. Have you ever been the victim of it and do you think people are sufficiently protected from humiliation and harassment online? Let us know in the HEXUS.community discussion forums.

 



HEXUS Forums :: 13 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Give them a break, its only 20 years too late!
Once the police have targets set for them to hit in terms of “cybercrime”, then they will start taking it seriously. Until then, fat chance.

And when they DO get a target, expect overzealous pursuit of “soft” targets, rather than ones which might actually require some effort: witness, for example, their massive enthusiasm for prosecuting drivers with Due Care offences even for trivial accidents, because it hits targets, and it's far easier than solving a burglary or something.

Sorry, nearly forgot: you can't call them “accidents” anymore. You may have thought they were joking in Hot Fuzz when they say “They're collisions now. Accidents implies no one was to blame”. They weren't.

Yes, IAALIRL.

Edit: right, rant out of the way. Sorry about that. But I do believe the above.

Anyway, I doubt the gov't gives a single, solitary sh*t about harrassment or what have you: their view is probably “for god's sake, man up!”. The Daily mash, I feel, hit the nail on the head recently with this article:

LInky

Unfortunately, as can be seen when someone is imprisoned for crimes against a company/ the economy vs the sentences people get for rape or murder, the message is this: “Doesn't really matter what you do to a human, go for your life. But don't you DARE f**k with a company.”
they seem to miss the point completely once again.

Dont bloody fight piracy, fight the cause off it
Shooty*;1766668
Once the police have targets set for them to hit in terms of “cybercrime”, then they will start taking it seriously. Until then, fat chance.

Hi guys I'm new to Hexus' community. I'm Jennifer - managing director of E-Victims.Org

Shooty has a point but before they can set targets the police have to first start recording e-crime. Currently, this isn't being done as there isn't a box to tick on their paperwork.
Blimey.

Welcome, Jennifer.